Optimizing an existing prediction model for quality of life one‐year post‐intensive care unit: An exploratory analysis. Issue 10 (31st August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Jonge, Manon; Wubben, Nina; van Kaam, Christiaan R.; Frenzel, Tim; Hoedemaekers, Cornelia W. E.; Ambrogioni, Luca; van der Hoeven, Johannes G.; van den Boogaard, Mark; Zegers, Marieke
• Is Part Of: Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica. Volume 66:Issue 10(2022)
• Page Start: 1228
• Page End: 1236
• Publication Date: 2022-08-31
• Subjects: critical care -- machine learning -- prediction modeling -- quality of life -- survivors; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1111/aas.14138
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-5172

Abstract

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to improve the PREPARE model, an existing linear regression prediction model for long‐term quality of life (QoL) of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors by incorporating additional ICU data from patients' electronic health record (EHR) and bedside monitors. Methods: The 1308 adult ICU patients, aged ≥16, admitted between July 2016 and January 2019 were included. Several regression‐based machine learning models were fitted on a combination of patient‐reported data and expert‐selected EHR variables and bedside monitor data to predict change in QoL 1 year after ICU admission. Predictive performance was compared to a five‐feature linear regression prediction model using only 24‐hour data (R 2 = 0.54, mean square error (MSE) = 0.031, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.128). Results: The 67.9% of the included ICU survivors was male and the median age was 65.0 [IQR: 57.0–71.0]. Median length of stay (LOS) was 1 day [IQR 1.0–2.0]. The incorporation of the additional data pertaining to the entire ICU stay did not improve the predictive performance of the original linear regression model. The best performing machine learning model used seven features (R 2 = 0.52, MSE = 0.032, MAE = 0.125). Pre‐ICU QoL, the presence of a cerebro vascular accident (CVA) upon admission and the highest temperature measured during the ICU stay were the most important contributors to predictive performance. Pre‐ICU QoL's contribution to predictive performance far exceeded that of the other predictors. Conclusion: Pre‐ICU QoL was by far the most important predictor for change in QoL 1 year after ICU admission. The incorporation of the numerous additional features pertaining to the entire ICU stay did not improve predictive performance although the patients' LOS was relatively short.