Management of patients presenting to the emergency department with sudden onset severe headache: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Issue 11 (31st March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walton, Matthew; Hodgson, Robert; Eastwood, Alison; Harden, Melissa; Storey, James; Hassan, Taj; Randall, Marc Stuart; Hassan, Abu; Williams, John; Wade, Ros
• Is Part Of: Emergency medicine journal. Volume 39:Issue 11(2022)
• Page Start: 818
• Page End: 825
• Publication Date: 2022-03-31
• Subjects: emergency department -- diagnosis -- computed tomography -- headache; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211900
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-0205

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Advances in imaging technologies have precipitated uncertainty and inconsistency in the management of neurologically intact patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with non-traumatic sudden onset severe headache with a clinical suspicion of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate diagnostic strategies in these patients. Methods: Studies assessing any decision rule or diagnostic test for evaluating neurologically intact adults with a severe headache, reaching maximum intensity within 1 hour, were eligible. Eighteen databases (including MEDLINE and Embase) were searched. Quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Where appropriate, hierarchical bivariate meta-analysis was used to synthesise diagnostic accuracy results. Results: Thirty-seven studies were included. Eight studies assessing the Ottawa SAH clinical decision rule were pooled; sensitivity 99.5% (95% CI 90.8 to 100), specificity 24% (95% CI 15.5 to 34.4). Four studies assessing CT within 6 hours of headache onset were pooled; sensitivity 98.7% (95% CI 96.5 to 100), specificity 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100). The sensitivity of CT beyond 6 hours was considerably lower (≤90%; 2 studies). Three studies assessing lumbar puncture (LP; spectrophotometric analysis) following negative CT were pooled; sensitivity 100% (95% CI 100 to 100), specificity 95% (95% CI 86.0 to 98.5). Conclusion: The Ottawa SAH Rule rules out further investigation in only a small proportion of patients. CT undertaken within 6 hours (with expertise of a neuroradiologist or radiologist who routinely interprets brain images) is highly accurate and likely to be sufficient to rule out SAH; CT beyond 6 hours is much less sensitive. The CT–LP pathway is highly sensitive for detecting SAH and some alternative diagnoses, although LP results in some false positive results.