Validation of the INDDEX24 mobile app v. a pen-and-paper 24-hour dietary recall using the weighed food record as a benchmark in Burkina Faso. Issue 9 (14th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rogers, Beatrice; Somé, Jérome W.; Bakun, Peter; Adams, Katherine P.; Bell, Winnie; Carroll, David Alexander; Wafa, Sarah; Coates, Jennie
• Is Part Of: British journal of nutrition. Volume 128:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: 1817
• Page End: 1831
• Publication Date: 2022-11-14
• Subjects: Dietary recall -- Survey methods -- Tablet-based data collection -- Accuracy -- Cost-effectiveness; Nutrition -- Periodicals; 572.4
• DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521004700
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1145

Abstract

Abstract: Effective nutrition policies require timely, accurate individual dietary consumption data; collection of such information has been hampered by cost and complexity of dietary surveys and lag in producing results. The objective of this work was to assess accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a streamlined, tablet-based dietary data collection platform for 24-hour individual dietary recalls (24HR) administered using INDDEX24 platform v . a pen-and-paper interview(PAPI) questionnaire, with weighed food record (WFR) as a benchmark. This cross-sectional comparative study included women 18–49 years old from rural Burkina Faso ( n 116 INDDEX24; n 115 PAPI). A WFR was conducted; the following day, a 24HR was administered by different interviewers. Food consumption data were converted into nutrient intakes. Validity of 24HR estimates of nutrient and food group consumption was based on comparison with WFR using equivalence tests (group level) and percentages of participants within ranges of percentage error (individual level). Both modalities performed comparably estimating consumption of macro- and micronutrients, food groups and quantities (modalities' divergence from WFR not significantly different). Accuracy of both modalities was acceptable (equivalence to WFR significant at P < 0·05) at group level for macronutrients, less so for micronutrients and individual-level consumption (percentage within ±20 % for WFR, 17–45 % for macronutrients, 5–17 % for micronutrients). INDDEX24 was more cost-effective than PAPI based on superior accuracy of a composite nutrient intake measure (but not gram amount or item count) due to lower time and personnel costs. INDDEX24 for 24HR dietary surveys linked to dietary reference data shows comparable accuracy to PAPI at lower cost.