Documenting the indication for antimicrobial prescribing: a scoping review. Issue 11 (12th May 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Documenting the indication for antimicrobial prescribing: a scoping review. Issue 11 (12th May 2022)
- Main Title:
- Documenting the indication for antimicrobial prescribing: a scoping review
- Authors:
- Saini, Sharon
Leung, Valerie
Si, Elizabeth
Ho, Certina
Cheung, Anne
Dalton, Dan
Daneman, Nick
Grindrod, Kelly
Ha, Rita
McIsaac, Warren
Oberai, Anjali
Schwartz, Kevin
Shiamptanis, Anastasia
Langford, Bradley J - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Documenting an indication when prescribing antimicrobials is considered best practice; however, a better understanding of the evidence is needed to support broader implementation of this practice. Objectives: We performed a scoping review to evaluate antimicrobial indication documentation as it pertains to its implementation, prevalence, accuracy and impact on clinical and utilisation outcomes in all patient populations. Eligibility criteria: Published and unpublished literature evaluating the documentation of an indication for antimicrobial prescribing. Sources of evidence: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts in addition to a review of the grey literature. Charting and analysis: Screening and extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Studies were categorised inductively and results were presented descriptively. Results: We identified 123 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature documents for inclusion. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (109, 89%). The median prevalence of antimicrobial indication documentation was 75% (range 4%–100%). Studies evaluating the impact of indication documentation on prescribing and patient outcomes most commonly examined appropriateness and identified a benefit to prescribing or patient outcomes in 17 of 19 studies. Qualitative studies evaluating healthcare worker perspectives (n=10) noted the common barriers and facilitators to thisAbstract : Background: Documenting an indication when prescribing antimicrobials is considered best practice; however, a better understanding of the evidence is needed to support broader implementation of this practice. Objectives: We performed a scoping review to evaluate antimicrobial indication documentation as it pertains to its implementation, prevalence, accuracy and impact on clinical and utilisation outcomes in all patient populations. Eligibility criteria: Published and unpublished literature evaluating the documentation of an indication for antimicrobial prescribing. Sources of evidence: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts in addition to a review of the grey literature. Charting and analysis: Screening and extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Studies were categorised inductively and results were presented descriptively. Results: We identified 123 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature documents for inclusion. Most studies took place in a hospital setting (109, 89%). The median prevalence of antimicrobial indication documentation was 75% (range 4%–100%). Studies evaluating the impact of indication documentation on prescribing and patient outcomes most commonly examined appropriateness and identified a benefit to prescribing or patient outcomes in 17 of 19 studies. Qualitative studies evaluating healthcare worker perspectives (n=10) noted the common barriers and facilitators to this practice. Conclusion: There is growing interest in the importance of documenting an indication when prescribing antimicrobials. While antimicrobial indication documentation is not uniformly implemented, several studies have shown that multipronged approaches can be used to improve this practice. Emerging evidence demonstrates that antimicrobial indication documentation is associated with improved prescribing and patient outcomes both in community and hospital settings. But setting-specific and larger trials are needed to provide a more robust evidence base for this practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ quality & safety. Volume 31:Issue 11(2022)
- Journal:
- BMJ quality & safety
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 11(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 11 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0031-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 787
- Page End:
- 799
- Publication Date:
- 2022-05-12
- Subjects:
- medication safety -- antibiotic management -- general practice -- healthcare quality improvement -- implementation science
Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals
Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals
362.106805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014582 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-5415
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24315.xml