Antiplatelet therapy for standalone coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (31st January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takase, Hajime; Tatezuki, Junya; Salem, Mohamed M; Tayama, Katsuko; Nakamura, Yoshihiko; Burkhardt, Jan-Karl; Yamamoto, Tetsuya
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 14:Number 12(2022)
• Page Start: 1207
• Page End: 1212
• Publication Date: 2022-01-31
• Subjects: aneurysm -- coil -- complication -- hemorrhage -- platelets; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018346
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-8478

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Endovascular embolization using standalone coils is the preferred treatment option for ruptured cerebral aneurysms to avoid the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with stent coiling or endoluminal flow diversion devices. However, it has been reported that patients undergoing the standalone coiling approach are at risk for periprocedural thromboembolism. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to clarify the risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy (AT) during coiling procedures performed to treat ruptured aneurysms, including the incidence of early thromboembolic events, hemorrhagic and delayed ischemic events, as well as clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of three databases was performed for articles from inception to June 2021. After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, five studies were included in this meta-analysis and 462 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) were identified who underwent endovascular standalone coiling treatment. Aneurysm location, patient characteristics, and aSAH grades were comparable between the AT and non-AT groups. Results: AT significantly decreased the incidence of thromboembolic events immediately after the coiling procedures compared with non-AT (OR 3.42; 95% CI 1.77 to 6.61, p<0.001). The incidences of hemorrhage, delayed ischemia, and clinical outcomes with or without AT were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: Although this study showed no beneficial effect of AT on clinical outcomes, the results suggest that AT could be combined with standalone coiling to avoid thromboembolism during the perioperative period. A large prospective study and/or an additional meta-analysis would be required to further investigate how AT benefits standalone coil embolization in aSAH.