The Irish "Bail-Out" and Cuts to Social Protection Spending— the Case for a Right to a Subsistence Minimum in EU Law. Issue 4 (1st July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Gorman, Roderic
• Is Part Of: German law journal. Volume 15:Issue 4(2014)
• Page Start: 569
• Page End: 597
• Publication Date: 2014-07-01
• Subjects: Law -- Germany -- Periodicals; Law -- Europe -- Periodicals; Comparative law -- Periodicals; International law -- Periodicals; jurisprudence; 349.4
• DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200019052
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2071-8322

Abstract

Abstract : As part of the 2010 EU/IMF economic adjustment program or "bail-out, " the Irish Government was required to undertake billions of euros in cuts to social protection spending over a three-year period. These have been implemented in subsequent budgets, resulting in increased levels of poverty and social exclusion. In light of these impacts on social rights in Ireland and other Member States, this article argues that the outcome of such Union legislative measures should be subject to some degree of rights-based scrutiny. It examines how, in the Hartz IV decision, the German Constitutional Court ruled that an attempt by the German Government to pass legislation that significantly cut a range of social welfare benefits breached the fundamental right to a subsistence minimum under the German Basic Law. Drawing inspiration from the approach of the German Constitutional Court, the article argues that the two elements of the German Basic Law which grounded that decision—the right to human dignity (Article 1(1)) and the social state principle (Article 20(1))—are both present within the Union Treaties as a result of changes occasioned by the Lisbon Treaty. The article advocates that the European Court of Justice should discover such a right within Union law and use it as a tool to analyze the impact of future cuts mandated by Union institutions on the economically disadvantaged.