Candida auris: a comparison between planktonic and biofilm susceptibility to antifungal drugs. Issue 9 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Romera, David; Aguilera‐Correa, John Jairo; Gadea, Ignacio; Viñuela‐Sandoval, Lourdes; García‐Rodríguez, Julio; Esteban, Jaime
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical microbiology. Volume 68:Issue 9(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: Candida -- auris -- susceptibility -- antifungal -- biofilm -- resistance; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; 616.9041
• DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2615

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction. : Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that mainly affects immunosuppressed patients and those with implanted medical devices. This pathogen also displays elevated resistance to common antifungals and high survival and spreading capacities. Since no antifungal breakpoints have yet been defined for this pathogen, the data obtained here can be useful for further research concerning treatment or implementation of a prevention and disinfection protocol. Our aim was to study the antifungal resistance of C. auris to current antifungals in planktonic and sessile states. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy and viable biomass production, we demonstrated the ability of C. auris to develop a mature biofilm. We compared the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) for the C. auris DSM 21092 strain plus two clinical isolates, and the results were compared with those obtained for Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis, two species strongly linked to bloodstream infections and infections associated with biomaterials. We found that the clinical isolates of C. auris were resistant to fluconazole and sensitive to echinocandins and polyenes. The C. auris biofilms did not show susceptibility to any antifungal agent, showing MBECs that were up to 512‐fold higher than the MICs. These findings highlight the importance of biofilm formation as a key factor underlying the resistance of this species to antifungals and suggest that the presence of implantable medical devices is one of the major risk factors in immunocompromised patients.