An unsupervised automated paradigm for artifact removal from electrodermal activity in an uncontrolled clinical setting. (30th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Subramanian, Sandya; Tseng, Bryan; Barbieri, Riccardo; Brown, Emery N
• Is Part Of: Physiological measurement. Volume 43:Number 11(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-11-30
• Subjects: electrodermal activity -- artifact detection -- artifact removal -- unsupervised learning -- clinical data; Physiology -- Measurement -- Periodicals; Patient monitoring -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac92bd
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-3334

Abstract

Abstract: Objective . Electrodermal activity (EDA) reflects sympathetic nervous system activity through sweating-related changes in skin conductance and could be used in clinical settings in which patients cannot self-report pain, such as during surgery or when in a coma. To enable EDA data to be used robustly in clinical settings, we need to develop artifact detection and removal frameworks that can handle the types of interference experienced in clinical settings while salvaging as much useful information as possible. Approach . In this study, we collected EDA data from 70 subjects while they were undergoing surgery in the operating room. We then built a fully automated artifact removal framework to remove the heavy artifacts that resulted from the use of surgical electrocautery during the surgery and compared it to two existing state-of-the-art methods for artifact removal from EDA data. This automated framework consisted of first utilizing three unsupervised machine learning methods for anomaly detection, and then customizing the threshold to separate artifact for each data instance by taking advantage of the statistical properties of the artifact in that data instance. We also created simulated surgical data by introducing artifacts into cleaned surgical data and measured the performance of all three methods in removing it. Main results . Our method achieved the highest overall accuracy and precision and lowest overall error on simulated data. One of the other methods prioritized high sensitivity while sacrificing specificity and precision, while the other had low sensitivity, high error, and left behind several artifacts. These results were qualitatively similar between the simulated data instances and operating room data instances. Significance . Our framework allows for robust removal of heavy artifact from EDA data in clinical settings such as surgery, which is the first step to enable clinical integration of EDA as part of standard monitoring.