Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Course of the Circumflex Artery: Anatomical Implications for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedures. Issue 5 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Batko, Jakub; Rams, Daniel; Filip, Grzegorz; Bartoszcze, Artur; Kapelak, Bogusław; Bartuś, Krzysztof; Litwinowicz, Radosław
• Is Part Of: Innovations. Volume 17:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 424
• Page End: 429
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: left coronary artery -- left atrial appendage -- 3-dimensional visualization -- left atrial appendage occlusion -- circumferential artery; Cardiovascular system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Blood-vessels -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Chest -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Thoracic Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals; Vascular Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals; Thorax -- Chirurgie -- Méthodologie -- Périodiques; Vaisseaux sanguins -- Chirurgie -- Méthodologie -- Périodiques; Blood-vessels -- Surgery; Chest -- Surgery; Periodicals; 617.41
• DOI: 10.1177/15569845221128569
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-9845

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomic topography of the circumflex artery (Cx) and left atrial appendage (LAA) and to determine the safety zones for epicardial LAA closure and LAA occlusion procedures. Methods: The left coronary artery was segmented and visualized from 116 computed tomography angiography scans. Four points were located on the Cx portion periappendicularly, starting from the entry point. The landing zone plane was defined as parallel to the LAA orifice at the level of the beginning of the periappendicular course of the Cx, and the plane of the neck bend was located at the end of the LAA neck. A distance smaller than 2 mm was considered a dangerous distance. Results: The distance between the Cx and the LAA landing zone was 4.3 ± 2 mm. The distance between the Cx and the LAA neck bend was 5.1 ± 2.2 mm. The distance between the Cx and the LAA bottom surface was 5.8 ± 2.9 mm. In 38.8% of patients, at least 1 distance between Cx and LAA was smaller than 2 mm in at least 1 dimension. These distances occurred in 30.2% of the LAA landing zone dimensions, 19.8% of LAA neck bend dimensions, and 11.2% of the LAA bottom surface distances. Conclusions: The study showed that most dangerous distances (30.2%) occurred in the LAA landing zone dimension. The data showed that landing zones more distal from the orifice of the LAA are safer in terms of Cx damage. Therefore, LAA closure should always be performed with caution, to avoid iatrogenic complications.