The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with large B‐cell lymphoma. (9th September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with large B‐cell lymphoma. (9th September 2021)
- Main Title:
- The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with large B‐cell lymphoma
- Authors:
- Lutfi, Forat
Holtzman, Noa G.
Kansagra, Ankit J.
Mustafa Ali, Moaath
Bukhari, Ali
Yan, Jingsheng
Samanta, Santanu
Gottlieb, David
Kim, Dong W.
Matsumoto, Lisa R.
Gahres, Natalie
Ruehle, Kathleen
Hankey, Kim G.
Douglas, Tracy
Lee, Seung T.
Law, Jennie Y.
Kocoglu, Mehmet H.
Atanackovic, Djordje
Yared, Jean A.
Hardy, Nancy M.
Molitoris, Jason
Mohindra, Pranshu
Rapoport, Aaron P.
Dahiya, Saurabh - Abstract:
- Summary: In the relapsed/refractory setting for treatment of large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL), chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Patients often have aggressive disease that requires prompt treatment in the form of bridging therapy (BT) for disease stabilisation while CAR‐T cells are manufactured. Patients ( n = 75) undergoing CAR‐T therapy infusion for LBCL at our institution were identified. A total of 52 (69·3%) received BT and 23 (30·7%) received no BT (NBT). BT modalities included systemic BT (SBT) in 28 patients, radiation BT (RBT) in 14, and high‐dose steroid BT (HDS) in 10. There was no difference in incidence of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome between BT and NBT ( P = 0·18 and P = 0·53 respectively). Prolonged cytopenias at Day 180 were more common in BT than NBT (50% vs. 13·3%, P = 0·04). The SBT and RBT subgroups had more cytopenias at Day 180 compared to the HDS and NBT subgroups (58·3% and 57·1% vs. 20% and 13·3% respectively, P = 0·04). Disease response at last follow‐up, progression‐free survival and overall survival were similar between BT, NBT, and BT subgroups. In summary, BT can be safely considered in patients undergoing CAR‐T therapy. However, those undergoing BT with SBT or RBT are at higher risk of prolonged cytopenias after CAR‐T therapy. Abstract : Graphical schema of study: bridging therapy (BT), no BT (NBT), systemic BT (SBT), and highSummary: In the relapsed/refractory setting for treatment of large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL), chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Patients often have aggressive disease that requires prompt treatment in the form of bridging therapy (BT) for disease stabilisation while CAR‐T cells are manufactured. Patients ( n = 75) undergoing CAR‐T therapy infusion for LBCL at our institution were identified. A total of 52 (69·3%) received BT and 23 (30·7%) received no BT (NBT). BT modalities included systemic BT (SBT) in 28 patients, radiation BT (RBT) in 14, and high‐dose steroid BT (HDS) in 10. There was no difference in incidence of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome between BT and NBT ( P = 0·18 and P = 0·53 respectively). Prolonged cytopenias at Day 180 were more common in BT than NBT (50% vs. 13·3%, P = 0·04). The SBT and RBT subgroups had more cytopenias at Day 180 compared to the HDS and NBT subgroups (58·3% and 57·1% vs. 20% and 13·3% respectively, P = 0·04). Disease response at last follow‐up, progression‐free survival and overall survival were similar between BT, NBT, and BT subgroups. In summary, BT can be safely considered in patients undergoing CAR‐T therapy. However, those undergoing BT with SBT or RBT are at higher risk of prolonged cytopenias after CAR‐T therapy. Abstract : Graphical schema of study: bridging therapy (BT), no BT (NBT), systemic BT (SBT), and high dose steroid BT (HDS) with reported 1‐year outcomes, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), and day 180 cytopenias. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of haematology. Volume 195:Number 3(2021)
- Journal:
- British journal of haematology
- Issue:
- Volume 195:Number 3(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 195, Issue 3 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 195
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0195-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 405
- Page End:
- 412
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-09
- Subjects:
- adoptive cellular therapies -- CAR‐T therapy -- bridging therapy -- cytokine release syndrome -- immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity
Hematology -- Periodicals
Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.15 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blacksci.co.uk/%7Ecgilib/jnlpage.bin?Journal=bjh&File=bjh&Page=aims ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2141 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjh.17738 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1048
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2309.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24214.xml