Does the Reduction Matter? Non-Emergent Ankle Fractures and the Effect of Near-Anatomic Reduction. Issue 4 (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Novack, Joseph C.; Manz, Wesley J.; Fink, Juliet; Jacobson, Joseph E.; Kadakia, Rishin J.; Coleman, Michelle M.; Bariteau, Jason T.
• Is Part Of: Foot & ankle orthopaedics. Volume 7:Issue 4(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Ankle Fracture -- Ankle Pain -- Ankle Fracture Evaluation; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 617.584
• DOI: 10.1177/2473011421S00852
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2473-0114

Abstract

Category: Ankle; Other Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are a common orthopedic injury observed in a wide variety of patient populations. Prior to being seen by an orthopedic specialist, patients with ankle fractures may have already undergone several procedures in the field or in the emergency department to stabilize or reduce the injured bone. While a paradigm that near-anatomic reduction improves outcomes in non-urgent ankle fractures exists, no study to date has shown objective evidence of this in postoperative patient- reported outcomes. The present study aims to evaluate whether adequate reduction of non-emergent ankle fractures within 24 hours of inciting injury influenced postoperative outcomes. Methods: All non-emergent ankle fractures treated by a single foot and ankle, fellowship-trained surgeon were queried over a period of 5 years and retrospectively evaluated through the electronic medical record. 97 patients over the age of 18 years with traumatic ankle fracture etiologies were considered. Plain film radiographs from initial presentation to the emergency department or first visit to orthopedics clinic were evaluated by the attending physician for adequate reduction based on AP and lateral tibiotalar congruency. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes data were collected from electronic medical record review. In the cases deemed to be dislocated or subluxated on initial injury films, the days until adequate reduction were calculated along with patient-reported VAS and SF-36 scores. Non-continuous data were compared using chi-squared tests, while continuous, non- normally distributed data were compared utilizing a Mann-Whitney U test. Alpha and beta for this study were assumed to be 0.05 and 0.8, respectively. Results: The average age was 46, with 68.9% of the patient population that was female. 51 patients were found to be adequately reduced within 24 hours, while 39 were not. The average time to final PRO follow-up was 12.6 months +- 1.9. No differences in preoperative VAS, SF-36 physical nor mental scores were noted between adequately and inadequately reduced cohorts (p= 0.654, p=0.262, p=0.760 respectively). Similarly, no differences in final postoperative follow up VAS, SF-36 physical nor mental scores were observed (p=0.503, p=0.252, p=0.296 respectively). VAS pain scores in both cohorts also improved to a similar degree over the preoperative to final postoperative follow up time point (p=0.261). Conclusion: These data show no difference in patient-reported pain or physical and mental functioning scores over 1 year after surgical fixation of the ankle, regardless of whether the ankle joint was adequately reduced within 24 hours of injury. We assert that anatomic reduction of the ankle joint following traumatic, non-emergent ankle fracture does not play a significant role in overall patient outcomes over 1 year following surgical correction.