A codevelopment process to advance methods for the use of patient‐reported outcome measures and patient‐reported experience measures with people who are homeless and experience chronic illness. (11th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Donald, Erin E.; Whitlock, Kara; Dansereau, Tracy; Sands, Daniel J.; Small, David; Stajduhar, Kelli I.
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 25:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 2264
• Page End: 2274
• Publication Date: 2022-04-11
• Subjects: health equity -- homeless -- homelessness -- patient‐oriented research -- patient‐reported outcomes -- substance use; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.13489
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: People who experience social disadvantage including homelessness suffer from numerous ill health effects when compared to the general public. Use of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient‐reported experience measures (PREMs) enables collection of information from the point of view of the person receiving care. Involvement in research and health care decision‐making, a process that can be facilitated by the use of PROMs and PREMs, is one way to promote equity in care. Methods: This article reports on a codevelopment and consultation study investigating the use of PROMs and PREMs with people who experience homelessness and chronic illness. Data were analysed according to interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Committee members with lived experience identified three themes for the role of PROMs and PREMs in health care measurement: trust and relationship‐building; health and quality of life; and equity, alongside specific recommendations for the design and administration of PROMs and PREMs. The codevelopment process is reported to demonstrate the meaningful investment in time, infrastructure and relationship‐building required for successful partnership between researchers and people with lived experience of homelessness. Conclusion: PROMs and PREMs can be meaningful measurement tools for people who experience social disadvantage, but can be alienating or reproduce inequity if they fail to capture complexity or rely on hidden assumptions of key concepts. Patient or Public Contribution: This study was conducted in active partnership between researchers and people with experience of homelessness and chronic illness, including priority setting for study design, data construction, analysis and coauthorship on this article.