Comprehensive assessment of integrated rice-crayfish farming system as a new paradigm to air-water-food nexus sustainability. (1st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Qiaoyu; Khoshnevisan, Benyamin; Zhu, Jianqiang; Wang, Weiwei; Liu, Yilin; Pan, Junting; Fan, Xianpeng; Zhang, Dingyue; Wu, Maoqian; Liu, Hongbin
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 377(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-01
• Subjects: Rice -- Crayfish -- Paddy fields -- Sustainable agriculture; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134247
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Integrated rice-crayfish farming (IRCF) is becoming a popular agricultural production mode and has expanded rapidly in China. However, serious concerns over the ecologically and environmentally friendly development of IRCF are still growing. Despite its importance, there is no comprehensive assessment study of IRCF to evaluate if it is a green and sustainable development in agricultural sector. To address such concerns, the life cycle assessment method at the endpoint level and water footprint were employed to elucidate the potential environmental risk caused by the fast development of IRCF. Furthermore, the economic assessment was also carried out using cost-benefit analysis. The results showed that, IRCF systems have higher impacts in the human health damage category compared to rice monoculture (RM) systems. This was attributed to the higher direct field emissions such as methane emission and high-water consumption in IRCF. However, IRCF had lower environmental impacts in the ecosystem damage category than RM, primarily due to decreased fertilizer inputs. Water footprint was the primary concern in IRCF, with 379% higher water consumption than RM. The expansion of IRCF can affect food security for the following two reasons: i) Outer ridge and ditch that are built around rice fields decrease rice planting area and hence total production, ii) Crayfish occupy rice fields in winter and the following spring, so winter-season crops such as winter wheat cannot be grown in IRCF fields. Economic assessment approved that the gross profit is the main motivation for farmers to shift from RM to IRCF, where 297% higher economic benefit can be achieved. Our results indicated that IRCF expansion improved farmers' income but came with potentially environmental and food security risks. Therefore, strict measures and rational land use planning should be implemented for the sustainable development of IRCF. Highlights: Rice-crayfish systems have been investigated from sustainability point of view. Economic assessment, LCA, and water footprint were used as sustainability measures. Integrated system showed relatively better environmental performance. Coculture systems showed 379% higher water footprint than monoculture systems. Water management needs prioritization to sustain rice coculture development.