'Using humanity to change systems' – understanding the work of online feedback moderation: A case study of Care Opinion Scotland. (March 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 'Using humanity to change systems' – understanding the work of online feedback moderation: A case study of Care Opinion Scotland. (March 2022)
- Main Title:
- 'Using humanity to change systems' – understanding the work of online feedback moderation: A case study of Care Opinion Scotland
- Authors:
- Berry, Emma
Skea, Zoë C
Campbell, Marion K
Locock, Louise - Abstract:
- Objective: To gain a deeper understanding of online patient feedback moderation through the organisation of Care Opinion in Scotland. Methods: An ethnographic study, initially using in-person participant observations, switching to remote methods due to the pandemic. This involved the use of remote observations and interviews. Interviews were carried out with the whole Scottish team ( n = 7). Results: Our results identify three major themes of work found in online patient feedback moderation. The first is process work, where moderators make decisions on how to edit and publish stories. The second is emotional labour from working with healthcare experiences and with NHS staff. The third is the brokering/mediation role of Care Opinion, where they must manage the relationships between authors, subscribing healthcare providers and Scottish Government. Our results also capture that these different themes are not independent and can at times influence the others. Conclusion: Our results build on previous literature on Care Opinion and provide novel insights into the emotional and brokering/mediation work they undertake. Care Opinion holds a unique position, where they must balance the interests of the key stakeholders. Care Opinion holds the power to amplify authors' voices but the power to make changes to services lies with NHS staff and services. Online moderation work is complex, and moderators require support to carry out their work especially given the emotional impact.Objective: To gain a deeper understanding of online patient feedback moderation through the organisation of Care Opinion in Scotland. Methods: An ethnographic study, initially using in-person participant observations, switching to remote methods due to the pandemic. This involved the use of remote observations and interviews. Interviews were carried out with the whole Scottish team ( n = 7). Results: Our results identify three major themes of work found in online patient feedback moderation. The first is process work, where moderators make decisions on how to edit and publish stories. The second is emotional labour from working with healthcare experiences and with NHS staff. The third is the brokering/mediation role of Care Opinion, where they must manage the relationships between authors, subscribing healthcare providers and Scottish Government. Our results also capture that these different themes are not independent and can at times influence the others. Conclusion: Our results build on previous literature on Care Opinion and provide novel insights into the emotional and brokering/mediation work they undertake. Care Opinion holds a unique position, where they must balance the interests of the key stakeholders. Care Opinion holds the power to amplify authors' voices but the power to make changes to services lies with NHS staff and services. Online moderation work is complex, and moderators require support to carry out their work especially given the emotional impact. Further research is planned to understand how patient stories are used by NHS Scotland, and the emotional labour involved with stories, from both the author and NHS staff perspective. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Digital health. Volume 8(2022)
- Journal:
- Digital health
- Issue:
- Volume 8(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0008-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-03
- Subjects:
- Emotional labour -- ethnography -- patient experience -- patient feedback -- online feedback -- qualitative research -- Care Opinion
Medical care -- Data processing -- Periodicals
Medical informatics -- Periodicals
362.10285 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗
http://dhj.sagepub.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/20552076211074489 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2055-2076
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24206.xml