'Everything True Will Be False': Paul of Venice and a Medieval Yablo Paradox. Issue 4 (2nd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Read, Stephen
• Is Part Of: History and philosophy of logic. Volume 43:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 332
• Page End: 346
• Publication Date: 2022-10-02
• Subjects: Paradox -- insolubles -- Heytesbury -- Swyneshed -- Paul of Venice; 01A35 -- 03A05; Logic -- Periodicals; 160.905
• DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2022.2040797
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5340

Abstract

Abstract : In his Quadratura, Paul of Venice considers a sophism involving time and tense which appears to show that there is a valid inference which is also invalid. Consider this inference concerning some proposition A : A will signify only that everything true will be false, so A will be false. Call this inference B . A and B are the basis of an insoluble-that is, a Liar-like paradox. Like the sequence of statements in Yablo's paradox, B looks ahead to a moment when A will be false, yet that moment may never come. In the Quadratura, Paul follows the solution to insolubles found in the collection of elementary treatises known as the Logica Oxoniensis, which posits an implicit assertion of its own truth in insolubles like B . However, in the treatise on insolubles in his Logica Magna, Paul develops and endorses a different solution that takes insolubles at face value. We consider how both types of solution apply to A and B : on both, B is valid. But on one, B has true premises and false conclusion, and contradictories can be false together; on the other (following the Logica Oxoniensis), the counterexample is rejected.