Operationalizing patient‐centered cancer care: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature on cancer patients' needs, values, and preferences. Issue 11 (23rd August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Kerri‐Anne R.; Brassil, Kelly J.; Rodriguez, Serena A.; Tsai, Edward; Fujimoto, Kayo; Krause, Kate J.; Shay, L. Aubree; Springer, Andrew E.
• Is Part Of: Psycho-oncology. Volume 29:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 1723
• Page End: 1733
• Publication Date: 2020-08-23
• Subjects: cancer -- patient‐centered care -- patient‐centered outcomes research -- qualitative research -- quality of healthcare -- systematic review -- value‐based purchasing; Cancer -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- psychology -- Periodicals; 616.9940019
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.5500
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-9249

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Efficiently addressing patient priorities and concerns remains a challenge in oncology. Systematic operationalization of patient‐centered care (PCC) can support improved assessment and practice of PCC in this unique care setting. This review aimed to synthesize the qualitative empirical literature exploring the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)'s PCC constructs of values, needs, and preferences among patients' during their cancer treatment experiences. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies published between 2002 and 2018 addressing adult patient values, needs, and preferences during cancer treatment was conducted. Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases were searched on September 10, 2018. Methodological rigor was assessed using a modified version of the Evaluation Tool for Qualitative Studies. Included study findings were analyzed using line‐by‐line coding; and the emergent themes were compared to the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)'s PCC dimensions. Results: Twenty‐nine primary studies were included in the synthesis. Descriptive themes for values (autonomy, being involved, family, hope, normality, and sincerity), needs (care coordination, information, privacy, support of physical well‐being, emotional support (family/friends, peer, provider), and self‐support), and preferences (care coordination, decision‐making, information delivery, source of social support, and treatment) were identified. "Cancer care context" emerged as an important domain in which these constructs are operationalized. This thematic framework outlines PCC attributes that oncology care stakeholders can evaluate to improve patient experiences. Conclusions: These findings build on previous PCC research and may contribute to the systematic assessment of patient priorities and the improvement of oncology care quality from the patient perspective.