Three criteria for radiological response on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib. Issue 1 (6th September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Three criteria for radiological response on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib. Issue 1 (6th September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Three criteria for radiological response on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib
- Authors:
- Kaneko, Shun
Tsuchiya, Kaoru
Kurosaki, Masayuki
Kirino, Sakura
Inada, Kento
Yamashita, Koji
Osawa, Leona
Hayakawa, Yuka
Sekiguchi, Shuhei
Watakabe, Keiya
Okada, Mao
Wang, Wan
Shimizu, Takao
Higuchi, Mayu
Takaura, Kenta
Maeyashiki, Chiaki
Tamaki, Nobuharu
Yasui, Yutaka
Takeguchi, Takaya
Takeguchi, Yuko
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Itakura, Jun
Takahashi, Yuka
Himeno, Yoshiro
Izumi, Namiki - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aim: Lenvatinib (LEN) is a newly approved, multikinase inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. In the present study, we investigated the impact of three different criteria for evaluating radiological objective response (OR) on overall survival in real‐world data. Methods: Consent for LEN therapy was obtained from 51 patients from April 2018 to March 2019. A total of 40 patients who received a minimal cumulative duration of 4 weeks of LEN were included in the analysis. Enhanced computed tomography scan was performed at baseline and every 4–8 weeks after LEN administration. Overall survival and OR were assessed with three different evaluations, as follows: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Choi criteria. Results: The average observation period for all participants after LEN introduction was 209.4 ± 77.5 days. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Choi criteria identified 10 of 40 (25.0%), 15 of 40 (37.5%), and 18of 40 (45.0%) patients with OR, respectively. The median overall survival in progressive disease evaluated by each criterion was 227 days. This result was significantly shorter than OR. Furthermore, the cumulative duration of LEN administration (>150 days) represented a significant prognostic factor (HR 0.160. 95% CI 0.039–0.646, P = 0.001). Conclusion: The Response Evaluation Criteria inAbstract : Aim: Lenvatinib (LEN) is a newly approved, multikinase inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. In the present study, we investigated the impact of three different criteria for evaluating radiological objective response (OR) on overall survival in real‐world data. Methods: Consent for LEN therapy was obtained from 51 patients from April 2018 to March 2019. A total of 40 patients who received a minimal cumulative duration of 4 weeks of LEN were included in the analysis. Enhanced computed tomography scan was performed at baseline and every 4–8 weeks after LEN administration. Overall survival and OR were assessed with three different evaluations, as follows: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Choi criteria. Results: The average observation period for all participants after LEN introduction was 209.4 ± 77.5 days. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Choi criteria identified 10 of 40 (25.0%), 15 of 40 (37.5%), and 18of 40 (45.0%) patients with OR, respectively. The median overall survival in progressive disease evaluated by each criterion was 227 days. This result was significantly shorter than OR. Furthermore, the cumulative duration of LEN administration (>150 days) represented a significant prognostic factor (HR 0.160. 95% CI 0.039–0.646, P = 0.001). Conclusion: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and Choi criteria were useful therapeutic evaluation methods in LEN therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. LEN's appropriate effect evaluation and management might lead to a better prognosis. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Hepatology research. Volume 50:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Hepatology research
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0050-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 137
- Page End:
- 143
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09-06
- Subjects:
- Choi criteria -- hepatocellular carcinoma -- lenvatinib -- modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors -- Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Liver Diseases -- Periodicals
Foie -- Maladies -- Périodiques
616.362 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09284346 ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1386-6346;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1872-034X ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13866346 ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118507311/home ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=hep ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/hepr.13416 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1386-6346
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4295.845000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24179.xml