Does 'Data fudging' explain the autocratic advantage? Evidence from the gap between Official Covid-19 mortality and excess mortality. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Neumayer, Eric; Plümper, Thomas
• Is Part Of: SSM - population health. Volume 19(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101247
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-8273

Abstract

Abstract: Governments can underreport Covid-19 mortality to make their performance appear more successful than it is. Autocracies are more likely to 'fudge' these data since many autocratic regimes restrict media freedom and thus can prevent domestic media from reporting evidence of undercounting deaths. Autocracies also enjoy greater leverage over reporting health authorities to either fudge data or adopt restrictive definitions of what constitutes Covid-19 mortality. Controlling for other factors that explain official Covid-19 mortality, excess mortality and the difference between the two, our results suggest that any apparent 'autocratic advantage' in fighting the pandemic is likely to only exist in official Covid-19 mortality. Analyzing the gap between excess mortality and official Covid-19 mortality we find that autocracies on average have a larger gap between official Covid-19 mortality data and excess mortality data, which points towards 'autocratic data fudging' of their official Covid-19 mortality statistics. Highlights: Autocracies have greater incentives and opportunity to underreport Covid-19 mortality. Excess mortality provides a check on the reliability of official Covid-19 mortality. Autocracies seemingly experience lower official Covid-19 mortality rates. Autocracies exhibit a larger gap between excess and reported Covid-19 mortality. More autocratic countries are more likely to 'fudge' their Covid-19 mortality data.