Identifying effective agricultural management practices for climate change adaptation and mitigation: A win-win strategy in South-Eastern Australia. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: He, Qinsi; Liu, De Li; Wang, Bin; Li, Linchao; Cowie, Annette; Simmons, Aaron; Zhou, Hongxu; Tian, Qi; Li, Sien; Li, Yi; Liu, Ke; Yan, Haoliang; Harrison, Matthew Tom; Feng, Puyu; Waters, Cathy; Li, Guangdi D.; de Voil, Peter; Yu, Qiang
• Is Part Of: Agricultural systems. Volume 203(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: Soil carbon sequestration -- Nitrous oxide emission -- Gross margin -- Crop rotation -- Residue retention -- Climate change; Agricultural systems -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 338.16
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103527
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-521X

Abstract

Abstract: CONTEXT: Farming systems face dual pressures of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to mitigate climate change and safeguarding food security to adapt to climate change. Building soil organic carbon (SOC) is proposed as a key strategy for climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, practices that increase SOC may also increase nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions, and impact crop yields and on-farm income. A comprehensive assessment of the effects of different management practices on trade-offs between GHG emissions and agricultural systems profitability under climate change is needed. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to: (1) analyze the long-term trends of SOC and N2 O emissions, and ascertain whether the croplands of the study region are net GHG sources or sinks under climate change; (2) quantify the GHG abatement on a gross margin basis; (3) identify effective management practices that could achieve a win-win strategy; and (4) investigate sources of uncertainty in estimates of GHG emissions and gross margins under climate change. METHODS: APSIM was used to simulate the effects of three crop residue retention rates (10%, 50% and 100%), and six representative crop rotations (wheat-canola, wheat-field pea-wheat-canola, wheat-field pea-wheat-oats, wheat-wheat-barley, wheat-wheat-canola, and wheat-wheat-oats) under two Shared Socio-economic Pathways scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585) using climate projections from 27 GCMs. GHG emissions and gross margins from 1961 to 2092 were assessed across 204 study sites in southeastern Australia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that residue retention can turn the soil from a carbon source (10% retention, 304–450 kg CO2 -eq ha −1 yr −1 ) to a carbon sink (100% retention, −269 ∼ −57 kg CO2 -eq ha −1 yr −1 ), and the potential of carbon sequestration was partly offset by concomitantly increased N2 O emissions. The wheat-wheat-canola rotation with full residue retention was shown to be a win-win solution with both large potential of GHG abatement and high gross margin compared with other rotations. Spatial analysis showed that the southeastern part of the study region, with higher rainfall, had higher gross margins, while the drier northwestern part had greater GHG emission reduction potentials. Although climate change led to increased GHG emissions and decreased yields for some crops, these adverse effects were overweighed by the higher SOC and yield advantages from full residue retention. SIGNIFICANCE: This study emphasizes the significant potential for agronomic management to maximize gross margin and reduce GHG emissions under climate change in southeast Australia. Results from this study could be used by farmers and policymakers to mitigate climate change without compromising agroecosystem profitability. Graphical abstract: Unlabelled Image Highlights: APSIM was used to simulate the effects of residue retention and crop rotation on GHG emissions and gross margins. Retaining all crop residues could turn the soil from a carbon source to a carbon sink, and benefit gross margins. Enhancement of residue retention on GHG abatement overweighed adverse effects of climate change under SSP245 and SSP585. The wheat-wheat-canola rotation was the most beneficial in terms of GHG mitigation and profitability compared with others.