Clinical Efficacy of Antianlotinib Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Effect on Serum VEGF, CEA, and SCC-Ag. (14th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: He, Linghui; Chen, Xi; Ding, Lingchi; Zhang, Xuedong
• Other Names: Yang Dong-Hua Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of oncology. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10-14
• Subjects: Oncology -- Research -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Neoplasms; Oncology -- Research; Tumors; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/1530875
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1687-8450

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose . This study is aimed at investigating the clinical safety and effectiveness of anlotinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods . We selected 68 NSCLC patients treated at the Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University from October 2019 to January 2022. Patients receiving ICI monotherapy were included in the control group (n = 36 ), whereas patients receiving anlotinib combined with ICIs were enrolled in the study group (n = 32 ). The survival, adverse reactions (AEs), and short-term clinical effectiveness of the two groups were observed. The tumor markers (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-AG)) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3 +, CD4 +, CD8 +, and CD4 + /CD8 + ) were determined before and after treatment. Results . Compared with the control group, the disease-control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) in the study group were substantially higher than that of the control group (62.50 vs. 36.11, 81.25 vs. 55.56; P < 0.05 ). The serum levels of VEGF, CEA, and SCC-AG in the two groups were considerably lower after two cycles of treatment (P < 0.05 ), and the serum levels of VEGF, CEA, and SCC-AG in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05 ). Following therapy, CD8 + in both groups decreased dramatically (P < 0.05 ), whereas CD3 +, CD4 +, and CD4 + /CD8 + were significantly increased, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05 ). The incidence of gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, and immune-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05 ). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the control and study groups for the first-line treatment patients was 7.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, whereas for the second-line treatment patients, it was 4.2 and 6.4 months, respectively. The mean PFS of study group was substantially longer than that of the control group regardless of the first- or second-line treatment. According to Cox analysis, the number of drug lines and TNM stage was independent risk variables impacting the prognosis of patients in this study. Conclusion . The combination of anlotinib with ICIs was more effective than either agent alone in the first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This treatment regimen did not interfere with immunological recovery or increase side effects.