A systematic review of clinical studies on variable proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE). (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Underwood, Tracy S.A.; McNamara, Aimee L.; Appelt, Ane; Haviland, Joanne S.; Sørensen, Brita Singers; Troost, Esther G.C.
• Is Part Of: Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 175(2022)
• Page Start: 79
• Page End: 92
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Proton therapy -- Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) -- Linear energy transfer (LET) -- Post-treatment image changes -- Proton toxicities; Oncology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9940642
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-8140

Abstract

Highlights: Many clinical studies have analysed patient toxicities/image changes to investigate proton RBE. Clinical evidence for variable proton RBE remains statistically weak. Expert statistical advice should be sought during study planning. Proton centres should collaborate on follow-up, enabling larger patient cohorts to be considered. Abstract: Recently, a number of clinical studies have explored links between possible Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) elevations and patient toxicities and/or image changes following proton therapy. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of such studies. We applied a "Problem [RBE], Intervention [Protons], Population [Patients], Outcome [Side effect]" search strategy to the PubMed database. From our search, we retrieved studies which: (a) performed novel voxel-wise analyses of patient effects versus physical dose and LET (n = 13), and (b) compared image changes between proton and photon cohorts with regard to proton RBE (n = 9). For each retrieved study, we extracted data regarding: primary tumour type; size of patient cohort; type of image change studied; image-registration method (deformable or rigid); LET calculation method, and statistical methodology. We compared and contrasted their methods in order to discuss the weight of clinical evidence for variable proton RBE. We concluded that clinical evidence for variable proton RBE remains statistically weak at present. Our principal recommendation is that proton centres and clinical trial teams collaborate to standardize follow-up protocols and statistical analysis methods, so that larger patient cohorts can ultimately be considered for RBE analyses.