Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of poisoning-induced cardiac arrest in Japan: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide registry. (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chiba, Takuyo; Otaka, Shunichi; Igeta, Ryuhei; Burns, Michele M; Ikeda, Shunya; Shiga, Takashi
• Is Part Of: Resuscitation. Volume 180(2022)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Poisoning -- Cardiac Arrest -- Neurologic Outcome -- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; POHCA Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest -- OHCA Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest -- ROSC Return of spontaneous circulation -- EMS Emergency medical service -- CPC Cerebral Performance Category -- IQR Interquartile range -- CPR Cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- Vf Ventricular fibrillation -- pVT Pulseless ventricular tachycardia -- PEA Pulseless electroactivity -- PS Propensity score -- ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Réanimation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.09.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9572

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Poisoning is an important cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest which can be challenging to manage. Neurological outcomes after poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) are yet to be fully elucidated. This retrospective cohort study sought to describe the characteristics of POHCA, and identify factors associated with favourable neurologic outcomes. Methods: Cardiac arrests recorded in the "All Japan Utstein Registry" from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017 were included. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics of POHCA and non-POHCA patients was performed. Neurological outcomes were compared between the POHCA and non-POHCA groups using logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent prolonged resuscitation. Results: Compared to non-POHCA patients (n = 665, 262), POHCA patients (n = 1, 868) were younger (median age, 80 vs 51 years) and had a lower likelihood of having a witness, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and an initial shockable rhythm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that POHCA was associated with favourable neurologic outcomes (odds ratio 1.54, 95 % confidence interval 1.19–2.01, p = 0.001). Among patients who received > 30 min of resuscitation, neurologic outcomes were similar in those with POHCA and non-POHCA (favourable neurologic outcome, 1.03 % vs 0.98 %, p = 0.87). Conclusions: POHCA is associated with favourable neurological outcomes and requires aggressive resuscitation. However, in patients who required prolonged resuscitation, the outcomes of POHCA were not different from those of non-POHCA. The decision to perform prolonged resuscitation should be guided on a case-by-case basis based on a range of factors.