Deep‐TOF‐PET: Deep learning‐guided generation of time‐of‐flight from non‐TOF brain PET images in the image and projection domains. Issue 16 (10th September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Deep‐TOF‐PET: Deep learning‐guided generation of time‐of‐flight from non‐TOF brain PET images in the image and projection domains. Issue 16 (10th September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Deep‐TOF‐PET: Deep learning‐guided generation of time‐of‐flight from non‐TOF brain PET images in the image and projection domains
- Authors:
- Sanaat, Amirhossein
Akhavanalaf, Azadeh
Shiri, Isaac
Salimi, Yazdan
Arabi, Hossein
Zaidi, Habib - Abstract:
- Abstract: We aim to synthesize brain time‐of‐flight (TOF) PET images/sinograms from their corresponding non‐TOF information in the image space (IS) and sinogram space (SS) to increase the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast of abnormalities, and decrease the bias in tracer uptake quantification. One hundred forty clinical brain 18 F‐FDG PET/CT scans were collected to generate TOF and non‐TOF sinograms. The TOF sinograms were split into seven time bins (0, ±1, ±2, ±3). The predicted TOF sinogram was reconstructed and the performance of both models (IS and SS) compared with reference TOF and non‐TOF. Wide‐ranging quantitative and statistical analysis metrics, including structural similarity index metric (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), as well as 28 radiomic features for 83 brain regions were extracted to evaluate the performance of the CycleGAN model. SSIM and RMSE of 0.99 ± 0.03, 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.09, 0.16 ± 0.04 were achieved for the generated TOF‐PET images in IS and SS, respectively. They were 0.97 ± 0.03 and 0.22 ± 0.12, respectively, for non‐TOF‐PET images. The Bland & Altman analysis revealed that the lowest tracer uptake value bias (−0.02%) and minimum variance (95% CI: −0.17%, +0.21%) were achieved for TOF‐PET images generated in IS. For malignant lesions, the contrast in the test dataset was enhanced from 3.22 ± 2.51 for non‐TOF to 3.34 ± 0.41 and 3.65 ± 3.10 for TOF PET in SS and IS, respectively. The implemented CycleGAN is capable of generatingAbstract: We aim to synthesize brain time‐of‐flight (TOF) PET images/sinograms from their corresponding non‐TOF information in the image space (IS) and sinogram space (SS) to increase the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast of abnormalities, and decrease the bias in tracer uptake quantification. One hundred forty clinical brain 18 F‐FDG PET/CT scans were collected to generate TOF and non‐TOF sinograms. The TOF sinograms were split into seven time bins (0, ±1, ±2, ±3). The predicted TOF sinogram was reconstructed and the performance of both models (IS and SS) compared with reference TOF and non‐TOF. Wide‐ranging quantitative and statistical analysis metrics, including structural similarity index metric (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), as well as 28 radiomic features for 83 brain regions were extracted to evaluate the performance of the CycleGAN model. SSIM and RMSE of 0.99 ± 0.03, 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.09, 0.16 ± 0.04 were achieved for the generated TOF‐PET images in IS and SS, respectively. They were 0.97 ± 0.03 and 0.22 ± 0.12, respectively, for non‐TOF‐PET images. The Bland & Altman analysis revealed that the lowest tracer uptake value bias (−0.02%) and minimum variance (95% CI: −0.17%, +0.21%) were achieved for TOF‐PET images generated in IS. For malignant lesions, the contrast in the test dataset was enhanced from 3.22 ± 2.51 for non‐TOF to 3.34 ± 0.41 and 3.65 ± 3.10 for TOF PET in SS and IS, respectively. The implemented CycleGAN is capable of generating TOF from non‐TOF PET images to achieve better image quality. Abstract : We aim to synthesize brain time‐of‐flight (TOF) PET images/sinograms from their corresponding non‐TOF information in the image space (IS) and sinogram space (SS) to increase the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast of abnormalities, and decrease the bias in tracer uptake quantification. The implemented CycleGAN is capable of generating TOF from non‐TOF PET images to achieve better image quality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Human brain mapping. Volume 43:Issue 16(2022)
- Journal:
- Human brain mapping
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Issue 16(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 16 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 16
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0043-0016-0000
- Page Start:
- 5032
- Page End:
- 5043
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09-10
- Subjects:
- brain imaging -- deep learning -- image quality -- PET/CT -- time‐of‐flight
Brain mapping -- Periodicals
611.81 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/hbm.26068 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1065-9471
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4336.031000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24138.xml