Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction following COVID-19 infection: evidence from 11 UK longitudinal population studies. (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thompson, Ellen J; Stafford, Jean; Moltrecht, Bettina; Huggins, Charlotte F; Kwong, Alex S F; Shaw, Richard J; Zaninotto, Paola; Patel, Kishan; Silverwood, Richard J; McElroy, Eoin; Pierce, Matthias; Green, Michael J; Bowyer, Ruth C E; Maddock, Jane; Tilling, Kate; Katikireddi, S Vittal; Ploubidis, George B; Porteous, David J; Timpson, Nic; Chaturvedi, Nish; Steves, Claire J; Patalay, Praveetha
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 9:Number 11(2022)
• Page Start: 894
• Page End: 906
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00307-8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2215-0366

Abstract

Summary: Background: Evidence on associations between COVID-19 illness and mental health is mixed. We aimed to examine whether COVID-19 is associated with deterioration in mental health while considering pre-pandemic mental health, time since infection, subgroup differences, and confirmation of infection via self-reported test and serology data. Methods: We obtained data from 11 UK longitudinal studies with repeated measures of mental health (psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction; mental health scales were standardised within each study across time) and COVID-19 status between April, 2020, and April, 2021. We included participants with information available on at least one mental health outcome measure and self-reported COVID-19 status (suspected or test-confirmed) during the pandemic, and a subset with serology-confirmed COVID-19. Furthermore, only participants who had available data on a minimum set of covariates, including age, sex, and pre-pandemic mental health were included. We investigated associations between having ever had COVID-19 and mental health outcomes using generalised estimating equations. We examined whether associations varied by age, sex, ethnicity, education, and pre-pandemic mental health, whether the strength of the association varied according to time since infection, and whether associations differed between self-reported versus confirmed (by test or serology) infection. Findings: Between 21 Dec, 2021, and July 11, 2022, we analysed data from 54 442 participants (ranging from a minimum age of 16 years in one study to a maximum category of 90 years and older in another; including 33 200 [61·0%] women and 21 242 [39·0%] men) from 11 longitudinal UK studies. Of 40 819 participants with available ethnicity data, 36 802 (90·2%) were White. Pooled estimates of standardised differences in outcomes suggested associations between COVID-19 and subsequent psychological distress (0·10 [95% CI 0·06 to 0·13], I 2 =42·8%), depression (0·08 [0·05 to 0·10], I 2 =20·8%), anxiety (0·08 [0·05 to 0·10], I 2 =0·0%), and lower life satisfaction (–0·06 [–0·08 to –0·04], I 2 =29·2%). We found no evidence of interactions between COVID-19 and sex, education, ethnicity, or pre-pandemic mental health. Associations did not vary substantially between time since infection of less than 4 weeks, 4–12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks, and were present in all age groups, with some evidence of stronger effects in those aged 50 years and older. Participants who self-reported COVID-19 but had negative serology had worse mental health outcomes for all measures than those without COVID-19 based on serology and self-report. Participants who had positive serology but did not self-report COVID-19 did not show association with mental health outcomes. Interpretation: Self-reporting COVID-19 was longitudinally associated with deterioration in mental health and life satisfaction. Our findings emphasise the need for greater post-infection mental health service provision, given the substantial prevalence of COVID-19 in the UK and worldwide. Funding: UK Medical Research Council and UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.