Who Will Benefit from Noncurative Resection in Patients with Gastric Cancer with Single Peritoneal Metastasis?. Issue 2 (February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xia, Xiang; Li, Chen; Yan, Min; Liu, Bingya; Yao, Xuexin; Zhu, Zhenggang
• Is Part Of: American surgeon. Volume 80:Issue 2(2014)
• Page Start: 124
• Page End: 130
• Publication Date: 2014-02
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- United States -- Periodicals; 617.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/000313481408000219
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-1348

Abstract

The value of noncurative resection for patients with gastric cancer with single peritoneal metastasis is still debatable. This study was undertaken to evaluate the survival benefit of resection in those patients. From 2006 to 2009, 119 patients with gastric cancer with single peritoneal metastasis were identified during surgery. Sixty-three of them had noncurative resection; the remainder had nonresection. Clinicopathological variables and survival were analyzed. Overall survival of patients in the noncurative resection group was longer than that in the nonresection group (14.869 vs 7.780 months). This survival advantage was still significantly better in the P1/P2 patients who underwent noncurative resection (mean survival time 21.164 vs 7.636 months, P = 0.001), but not in the P3 group ( P = 0.489). Multivariate analysis indicated that only noncurative resection retained a significant association with better prognosis in P1/P2 patients. The perioperative mortality rate in the resection group was not significantly higher than that of the noncurative group ( P = 0.747). Noncurative resection can prolong the survival of patients with gastric cancer with single P1/P2 peritoneal metastasis. This surgical approach should not be taken into account for those patients with P3 gastric cancer.