A biomechanical study to compare spinal movement in a healthy volunteer during extrication between 'chain cabling' and 'roof off' methods of extrication. Issue 11 (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nutbeam, Tim; Fenwick, Rob; May, Barbara; Stassen, Willem; Smith, Jason E; Bowdler, Jono; Wallis, Lee; Shippen, James
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 53:Issue 11(2022)
• Page Start: 3605
• Page End: 3612
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Prehospital care -- Extrication -- Motor vehicle collision -- Road traffic collision; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Highlights: Patients who are trapped following a MVC are more likely to die. Chain cabling extrication was associated with more movement in all planes at the cervical and lumbar spine when compared to 'roof off' extrication in this biomechanical analysis. In comparison to historically collected data with identical methods, chain cabling performed similarly to other extrication types. Abstract: Introduction: Following a motor vehicle collision some patients will remain trapped. Traditional extrication methods are time consuming and focus on movement minimisation and mitigation. 'Chain cabling' is an alternative method of extrication used in some countries. The optimal extrication strategy and the effect of extrication methods on spinal movement is unknown. This study compares 'chain cabling' to the established roof removal method of extrication on spinal movement. Methods: Biomechanical data were collected using Inertial Measurement Units on a single healthy volunteer during multiple experiments. The extrication types examined were chain cabling and roof removal. Measurements were recorded at the cervical and lumbar spine, and in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LR) planes. Total movement (travel), maximal movement, mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals are reported. Results: Eight experiments were performed using each technique. The smallest mean overall movements were recorded during roof-off extrication (cervical spine 0.6 mm for AP and LR, lumbar spine 3.9 mm AP and 0.3 mm LR). The largest overall mean movements were seen with chain cabling extrication (cervical spine AP 5.3 mm. LR 6.1 mm and lumbar spine 6.8 mm AP and 6.3 mm LR). Conclusion: In this study of a healthy volunteer, roof-off extrication was associated with less movement than chain cabling. The movement associated with chain cabling extrication was similar to that previously collected for other extrication types.