A Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Adult and Paediatric Formulations of Raltegravir in Healthy Adults. Issue 6 (August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rhee, Elizabeth G; Rizk, Matthew L; Brainard, Diana M; Gendrano, Isaias N; Jin, Bo; Wenning, Larissa A; Wagner, John A; Iwamoto, Marian
• Is Part Of: Antiviral therapy. Volume 19:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 619
• Page End: 624
• Publication Date: 2014-08
• Subjects: Antiviral agents -- Periodicals; Antiviral Agents -- therapeutic use; Virus Diseases -- therapy; Viruses -- drug effects; Antiviral agents; Periodical; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.9106
• DOI: 10.3851/IMP2765
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-6535

Abstract

Background: Raltegravir is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor approved for use in adults, children and infants ≥4 weeks of age. As alternatives to the original film-coated tablet, a chewable ethylcellulose (EC) tablet and oral granules for suspension (GFS) have been developed for use in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these formulations in adults prior to use in paediatric studies. Methods: This open-label, 4-period, randomized, crossover study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raltegravir paediatric formulations and the effect of a high-fat meal on EC tablet pharmacokinetics in healthy adults. In a balanced, crossover design (with a 4-day washout between treatments), 12 subjects received one 400 mg film-coated tablet (fasted), four 100 mg EC tablets (fasted), one 400 mg GFS dose (fasted) and four 100 mg EC tablets (after a high-fat meal). Results: AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 2.6-fold and 4.6-fold higher for GFS and 1.8-fold and 3.2-fold higher for EC versus film-coated tablets. The geometric mean C12h values for the GFS formulation (162 nM) and the EC tablet (134 nM) were similar to that of the film-coated tablet (149 nM). Administration with a high-fat meal increased C12h, decreased Cmax and delayed Tmax for the EC tablet, but did not affect AUC0-∞ . There were no serious adverse events (AEs) and no discontinuations due to drug-related clinical or laboratory AEs. Conclusions: Both paediatric formulations demonstrate moderately higher AUC0-∞ and Cmax, and similar C12h compared with the film-coated tablet. These data support the use of raltegravir GFS and EC formulations in paediatric studies.