Challenges and bottlenecks for butterfly conservation in a highly anthropogenic region: Europe's worst case scenario revisited. (October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Challenges and bottlenecks for butterfly conservation in a highly anthropogenic region: Europe's worst case scenario revisited. (October 2022)
- Main Title:
- Challenges and bottlenecks for butterfly conservation in a highly anthropogenic region: Europe's worst case scenario revisited
- Authors:
- Maes, Dirk
Van Calster, Hans
Herremans, Marc
Van Dyck, Hans - Abstract:
- Abstract: The recent decline in insect diversity and abundance and the consequences for associated ecosystem functioning and services have attracted growing attention. Especially highly anthropogenic regions are affected by rapid biodiversity changes including significant losses. Two decades ago, we suggested that Flanders (northern Belgium) was Europe's worst case scenario for butterfly diversity loss with habitat destruction, fragmentation and nitrogen deposition as major causes (Maes and Van Dyck, 2001). To analyse changes since the second half of the 20th century, we used >2.5 million distribution records to calculate trends in distribution during the last three decades. By linking these trends to the species' ecology using multi-species indicators for a set of ecological and life-history traits, we determined the most important drivers policy makers and nature managers should focus on. Species showing the strongest expansion are woodland specialists and polyphagous species. On the other hand, sedentary species of nutrient-poor biotopes such as heathlands and semi-natural grasslands showed a decreasing trend, despite the ongoing policy focus and conservation efforts. We discuss our results with regard to challenges and bottlenecks for the conservation of butterflies and other insects in anthropogenic regions. Graphical abstract: Multispecies Change Indices (MSCI ± se) for biotope preference of butterflies in three decades compared to a reference period (1951–1990). OnAbstract: The recent decline in insect diversity and abundance and the consequences for associated ecosystem functioning and services have attracted growing attention. Especially highly anthropogenic regions are affected by rapid biodiversity changes including significant losses. Two decades ago, we suggested that Flanders (northern Belgium) was Europe's worst case scenario for butterfly diversity loss with habitat destruction, fragmentation and nitrogen deposition as major causes (Maes and Van Dyck, 2001). To analyse changes since the second half of the 20th century, we used >2.5 million distribution records to calculate trends in distribution during the last three decades. By linking these trends to the species' ecology using multi-species indicators for a set of ecological and life-history traits, we determined the most important drivers policy makers and nature managers should focus on. Species showing the strongest expansion are woodland specialists and polyphagous species. On the other hand, sedentary species of nutrient-poor biotopes such as heathlands and semi-natural grasslands showed a decreasing trend, despite the ongoing policy focus and conservation efforts. We discuss our results with regard to challenges and bottlenecks for the conservation of butterflies and other insects in anthropogenic regions. Graphical abstract: Multispecies Change Indices (MSCI ± se) for biotope preference of butterflies in three decades compared to a reference period (1951–1990). On average, specialist species of heathlands showed a continuous decline compared to the reference period 1951–1990. Specialist species of woodlands, on the other hand, showed a continuous increase since the period 1951–1990. The dashed lines indicate the (arbitrary) thresholds for increases (+100 %) or decreases (−50 %) compared to the reference period 1951–1990. The figures in grey indicate the number of species in each period and each biotope class. The grey dots indicate the mean MSCI and the trend is given in white in the dots: + = increase, +∼ = moderate increase, ∼ = stable, −∼ = moderate decrease, − = decrease, ?+ = potential increase, ?− = potential decrease. Unlabelled Image … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biological conservation. Volume 274(2022)
- Journal:
- Biological conservation
- Issue:
- Volume 274(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 274, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 274
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0274-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10
- Subjects:
- Conservation -- Management -- Red List -- Species traits -- Threatened species -- Translocation
Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals
Nature conservation -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.9516 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109732 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0006-3207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2075.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24125.xml