Atrial function analysis after percutaneous umbrella device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure: a prospective study. (3rd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tarsia, C; Gaspardone, C; De Santis, A; D'Ascoli, E; Piccioni, F; Sgueglia, G A; Iamele, M; Leonetti, S; Posteraro, G A; Gaspardone, A
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 43(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-10-03
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2134
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a new technique, achieving closure of the PFO by means of a simple suture. The difference between traditional occluders and a simple suture might have different impact on atrial structure, geometry and function. Purpose: Aim of this study was to evaluate bi-atrial function after closure of PFO by direct suture and traditional occluders. Methods: We studied 40 age and sex matched patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by device and 20 by suturing. Only patients with no residual right-to-left shunt, assessed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography, were included. Left and right atrial function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the following parameters: strain values of the reservoir (r-ED), conduit (cd-ED) and contraction phase (ct-ED). All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiographic examination the day before and 1 year after the procedure. All exams and measurements were conducted by two echocardiographers and validated with common consent by two other expert operators. Results: Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at one year follow-up, patients underwent occluder implantation had significantly worst indices of left (LA) and right (RA) atrial reservoir function (LA r-ED p<0.001; RA r-ED p<0.001), conduit function (LA cd-ED p<0.001; RA cd-ED p<0.001) and contraction function (LA ct-ED p<0.05; RA ct-ED p<0.05). In patients underwent suture-mediated PFO closure, no significant differences were observed in the same indices of reservoir (LA r-ED p=0.848; RA r-ED p=0.183), conduit (LA cd-ED p=0.156; RA cd-ED p=0.419) and contraction function (LA ct-ED p=0.193; RA ct-ED p=0.375). Conclusions: Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with worse atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favor the development of atrial arrhythmias. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.