Added value of left atrial strain in outcome prediction after myocardial infarction. SWEDEHEART-registry based echocardiographic study. (3rd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sjolen, L; Lenell, J; Lindahl, B; Baron, T
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 43(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-10-03
• Subjects: Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1304
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Left ventricular function parameters, such as ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain are widely accepted prognostic parameters after myocardial infarction. Left atrial strain has been suggested as a novel risk parameter in this population. Objective: To investigate whether left atrial (LA) deformation parameters (LA reservoir strain, LARS) can improve prognostic value of traditional echo parameters in prediction of heart failure and dead in patients after myocardial infarction. Moreover, to study relationship between LARS and established LV function parameters, and test its reproducibility between the readers. Method: A total of 380 patients with myocardial infarction, hospitalized at our university hospital between 2008–2014, underwent echocardiography during hospital stay. The collected images was reanalyzed with respect to left atrial strain. Patients were followed up within the Swedish myocardial infarction registry (SWEDEHEART). Results: To the final analysis a total of 253 patients (64 years of age, 81% men) were included, and followed up over median of 4.9 years. Among the parameters tested in the univariate analysis, LARS was able to predict long-term risk of heart failure admissions and death in patients with myocardial infarction (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91–0.99 for combined end-point). LARS below 27.2% identifies patients with higher risk of combined endpoint with AUC 0.68 (p=0.001). After adjustment for background characteristics and established LV function measures, LARS has lost significance, meaning that it provides no additional information in this population. LARS correlates moderately with LV GLS (r=−0.52, p<0.001) and weakly with LVEF (r=0.31, p<0.001), to a moderate extent and to a small extent with LAVI and LVEF, respectively. LARS shows moderate to perfect agreement between reviewers. Conclusions: LARS is a good prognosticator of death and heart failure hospitalizations after myocardial infarction, but not independent of the established LV function parameters. We showed a good correlation between LARS and LV strain parameters and its near perfect inter-reader reproducibility. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.