OC-086 COMPARISON OF MESH-FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF INCISIONAL HERNIA, RELIATACK™ V PROTACK™ (TACKOMESH) NCT 03434301. (13th October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- OC-086 COMPARISON OF MESH-FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF INCISIONAL HERNIA, RELIATACK™ V PROTACK™ (TACKOMESH) NCT 03434301. (13th October 2022)
- Main Title:
- OC-086 COMPARISON OF MESH-FIXATION TECHNIQUES IN LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF INCISIONAL HERNIA, RELIATACK™ V PROTACK™ (TACKOMESH) NCT 03434301
- Authors:
- Pilkington, J
Wilkinson, F
Pritchett, J
Fullwood, C
Sheen, A J - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: A study examining post-op pain, comparing permanent versus absorbable tack fixation devices, Protack™ versus Reliatack™, in IPOM plus repair. Methods: TACKoMesh is a single-centre double-blind RCT conducted from 2017–2020 with 1-year follow up. Patients were randomised to either Protack™ (titanium tacks) or Reliatack™ (an articulating-arm with dissolvable tacks). Primary outcome was reported pain on activity at Day30. Secondary outcomes include recurrence and quality of life measures (SF-36 & Carolina Comfort Score). Results: 67 patients randomised: 36 with Protack™, 27 with Reliatack™, with 4 conversions. No significant difference in reported pain 'on activity' (post-operative Day 1, 6, 30 and 365). There was significantly reduced pain 'at rest' on Day1 with Reliatack™ (Protack™ 6 [4 to 9] vs Reliatack™ 4 [3 to 5], p = 0.020) and reduced pain at all other points with Reliatack™. Operation (p = 0.001) & mesh-fixation (p = 0.001) times were longer, with more knots (p = 0.001) & tacks (p = 0.001) used with Reliatack™. Entire cohort hernia recurrence, seroma formation, SSI & Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complication were 8/63 (12.7%), 33/63 (52.4%), 7/63 (11.1%), and 12/63 (19.1%) respectively. There were no significant differences in these outcomes between the treatment groups. CCS showed improvement from post-op Day30 to 365. SF36 showed a reduction in baseline scores at post-op Day30. Conclusion: There is no difference in reported pain 'on activity'Abstract: Background: A study examining post-op pain, comparing permanent versus absorbable tack fixation devices, Protack™ versus Reliatack™, in IPOM plus repair. Methods: TACKoMesh is a single-centre double-blind RCT conducted from 2017–2020 with 1-year follow up. Patients were randomised to either Protack™ (titanium tacks) or Reliatack™ (an articulating-arm with dissolvable tacks). Primary outcome was reported pain on activity at Day30. Secondary outcomes include recurrence and quality of life measures (SF-36 & Carolina Comfort Score). Results: 67 patients randomised: 36 with Protack™, 27 with Reliatack™, with 4 conversions. No significant difference in reported pain 'on activity' (post-operative Day 1, 6, 30 and 365). There was significantly reduced pain 'at rest' on Day1 with Reliatack™ (Protack™ 6 [4 to 9] vs Reliatack™ 4 [3 to 5], p = 0.020) and reduced pain at all other points with Reliatack™. Operation (p = 0.001) & mesh-fixation (p = 0.001) times were longer, with more knots (p = 0.001) & tacks (p = 0.001) used with Reliatack™. Entire cohort hernia recurrence, seroma formation, SSI & Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complication were 8/63 (12.7%), 33/63 (52.4%), 7/63 (11.1%), and 12/63 (19.1%) respectively. There were no significant differences in these outcomes between the treatment groups. CCS showed improvement from post-op Day30 to 365. SF36 showed a reduction in baseline scores at post-op Day30. Conclusion: There is no difference in reported pain 'on activity' following elective IPOM plus hernia repair when choosing either Protack™ or Reliatack™. There is a trend towards improved post-op pain 'at rest' with Reliatack™. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 7
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2022)Supplement 7
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 7 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0109-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-13
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znac308.096 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24101.xml