P-070 SYNTHETIC MESH VERSUS BIOLOGICAL IMPLANT TO PREVENT INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER LOOP-ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE: A RANDOMIZED FEASIBILITY TRIAL. (13th October 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- P-070 SYNTHETIC MESH VERSUS BIOLOGICAL IMPLANT TO PREVENT INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER LOOP-ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE: A RANDOMIZED FEASIBILITY TRIAL. (13th October 2022)
- Main Title:
- P-070 SYNTHETIC MESH VERSUS BIOLOGICAL IMPLANT TO PREVENT INCISIONAL HERNIA AFTER LOOP-ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE: A RANDOMIZED FEASIBILITY TRIAL
- Authors:
- Mäkäräinen, E
Wiik, H
Kössi, J
Pinta, T
Mäntymäki, L M
Mattila, A
Kairaluoma, M
Ohtonen, P
Rautio, T - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of synthetic mesh compared to a biological mesh in incisional hernia prevention after loop-ileostomy closure. Material & Methods: Up to one third of patients experience incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure, justifying hernia prevention procedures. Although biological meshes have been widely used in contaminated surgical sites instead of synthetic ones due to complication concerns, previous data on the subject does not support this practice. A randomized, controlled, multi-center non-inferior feasibility trial was conducted from April 2018 – November 2021. Patients (n=102) were randomized 1:1 to receive either a light-weight synthetic polypropylene mesh (Parietene Macro TM, Medtronic) (SM) or a biological mesh (Permacol TM, Medtronic) (BM) to the retrorectus space at loop-ileostomy closure after anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. The primary outcome was rate of surgical site infections (SSI) at 30-day follow-up. Results: In total, 102 patients were randomized, of which 97 received the intended allocation. At 30-day follow-up, 94 patients (97%) were evaluated. Of patients in the SM group, 1/46 (2%) had SSI and in the BM group 2/48 (4%) had SSI (p>0.90). Uneventful wound healing was recorded in 38/46 (86%) and 43/48 (90%) patients in the SM and BM groups, respectively. One patient from each group underwent reoperation requiring mesh removal (p>0.90). Conclusions: Both a syntheticAbstract: Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of synthetic mesh compared to a biological mesh in incisional hernia prevention after loop-ileostomy closure. Material & Methods: Up to one third of patients experience incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure, justifying hernia prevention procedures. Although biological meshes have been widely used in contaminated surgical sites instead of synthetic ones due to complication concerns, previous data on the subject does not support this practice. A randomized, controlled, multi-center non-inferior feasibility trial was conducted from April 2018 – November 2021. Patients (n=102) were randomized 1:1 to receive either a light-weight synthetic polypropylene mesh (Parietene Macro TM, Medtronic) (SM) or a biological mesh (Permacol TM, Medtronic) (BM) to the retrorectus space at loop-ileostomy closure after anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. The primary outcome was rate of surgical site infections (SSI) at 30-day follow-up. Results: In total, 102 patients were randomized, of which 97 received the intended allocation. At 30-day follow-up, 94 patients (97%) were evaluated. Of patients in the SM group, 1/46 (2%) had SSI and in the BM group 2/48 (4%) had SSI (p>0.90). Uneventful wound healing was recorded in 38/46 (86%) and 43/48 (90%) patients in the SM and BM groups, respectively. One patient from each group underwent reoperation requiring mesh removal (p>0.90). Conclusions: Both a synthetic mesh and biological mesh were safe in incisional hernia prevention after loop-ileostomy closure. Hernia prevention efficiency will be reported after long-term patient follow-ups. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 7
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2022)Supplement 7
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 7 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0109-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-10-13
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znac308.168 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24101.xml