G6 How the pandemic has affected paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition training in the UK. (12th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rupasinghe, Kushila; Onyeador, Nkem; Mark Beattie, R
• Is Part Of: Frontline gastroenterology. Volume 13(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A19
• Page End: A19
• Publication Date: 2022-09-12
• Subjects: Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-bspghan.25
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-4137

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (PGHAN) GRID is the U.K. pathway for training. Training is overseen by College Specialist Advisory Committees (CSACs) and monitored in previous years through surveys, which have been used as a springboard to implement improvement and change. The Coronavirus pandemic has been well documented with impact on staffing, training, and mental wellbeing of healthcare professionals. We aimed to look holistically at the PGHAN training during a 6-month period of the pandemic. Aim: To understand the state of PGHAN training and trainees during the Coronavirus pandemic. To provide clarity on the challenges and compare with data from previous surveys. To highlight positive practices that can be continued or reinforced. Subject and Methods: Trainees working between March 2021 and September 2021, after the 2nd U.K. lockdown, were surveyed anonymously using an electronic form. The survey included a combination of question types, including Likert scales, yes/no and sections for free text. Initial distribution of the survey was August 2021 and reminders were sent following the post before the survey was closed in November 2021. Results: Surveys were completed by all 23 PGHAN GRID trainees, comparing favourably to 100% and 75% response rates in previous surveys in 2016 and 2018 respectively. 43% of trainees were less than full time (LTFT), with 26% at ST8 level. 43% of trainees were personally affected by Covid. 70% reported feeling safe at work. Online teaching was useful to 87% of trainees, though only 17% could attend >50% of sessions. 74% requested more online sessions. Of the 19 trainees that attended the virtual Trainees' Day, 63% found it useful. 59% of trainees were not signed off for OGD, with 23% citing a lack of Joint Advisory Group (JAG) approved course attendance as a reason. Table 1 summarises some captured effects of the pandemic and table 2 also shows some differences between previous years. Summary and Conclusion: The survey received an excellent response rate. Notably, most trainees felt safe at work though a minority felt that their mental health was negatively affected with Covid-19. Most trainees felt supported by their team members during the pandemic. Endoscopy lists were felt to be reduced, though list numbers after the second lockdown were comparable to pre-pandemic year 2018. This suggests that services returned to near normal, though numbers still require improvement. The list numbers during the height of the pandemic were not captured. Availability and access to JAG accredited Paediatric endoscopy courses needs to be prioritised. Rota coordinators should be aware that almost half the PGHAN trainees are LTFT, a more recent phenomenon that requires dynamic solutions. Online teaching sessions were very well received, and we should embrace online strategies for education, training, and support. The attendance to online teaching has been an issue suggesting more support is required and the Trainees' Day attendance should be encouraged. Trainee access to the HPN clinic should be improved, and barriers to this should be explored. The overall percentage time worked in sub-speciality has improved from 2018, which should be carried forward for subsequent years.