Aesthetic and Implication Analysis of the Traditional Poetic Environment Based on Natural Language Emotion Analysis. (28th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Hui
• Other Names: kaifa Zhao Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental and public health. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09-28
• Subjects: Environmental health -- Periodicals; Occupational diseases -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 613.105
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/3300449
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1687-9805

Abstract

Abstract : The uniqueness of aesthetic implication in Zhou Dynasty poetics lies in that it is the basic forming stage of the concept of formal beauty of the whole Chinese nation, and the aesthetic implication of the Zhou Dynasty poetics art has fundamental significance for the whole ancient Chinese aesthetic implication theory. In the discipline of natural language processing, text emotion analysis is a crucial topic. Artificial neural network research is where the idea of "deep learning" (DL) first emerged. In view of the problems that semantic information is easy to be lost and emotional information may be ignored in the traditional Chinese short text emotion analysis model, this paper introduces the AM (attention mechanism) and proposes a CNN-LSTM (convolutional neural network-long short-term memory) poetic aesthetic implication analysis method based on self-attention. For the IL (input layer), word vectors trained by Word2Vec are used and then input into the CNN-LSTM joint model. Then, the output of the joint model is weighted and summed by self-attention and finally input into the Softmax classifier, so as to realize the emotion classification of the text. By creating and putting into practise pertinent comparative experiments, the usefulness of the proposed model is confirmed. The outcomes demonstrate that this model outperforms the other three comparison models for the quantification of evaluation indices in terms of overall performance. The accuracy and F1 of this paper are 93.362% and 90.886%, respectively, which are higher than other models.