Initiating palliative care consultation for acute critically ill patients in the emergency department intensive care unit. Issue 5 (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Che; Yang, Tsu-Te; Tsou, Yu-Ju; Lin, Ming-Hui; Fan, Ju-Sing; Huang, Hsien-Hao; Tsai, Ming-Che; Yen, David Hung-Tsang
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. Volume 83:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 500
• Page End: 506
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: Emergency service -- Health care utilization -- Palliative care; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000297
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1726-4901

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Little is known about the characteristics of patients needing palliative care consultation in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to investigate the impacts of initiating screening in acute critically ill patients needing palliative care on mortality, health care resources, and end-of-life (EOL) care in the intensive care unit in ED (EICU). Methods: We conducted an analysis study in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. From February 1 to July 31, 2018, acute critically ill patients in EICU were recruited. The primary outcomes were inhospital mortality and EOL care. The secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics and health care utilization. Results: A total of 796 patients were screened, with 396 eligible and 400 noneligible patients needing palliative care consultations. The mean age was 74.8 ± 17.1 years, and 62.6% of the patients were male. According to logistic regression analysis, clinical predictors, including age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.028; 95% CI, 1.015-1.042), respiratory distress and/or respiratory failure (AOR, 2.670; 95% CI, 1.829-3.897), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (AOR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.009-1.064), Charlson Comorbidity Index score (AOR, 1.212; 95% CI, 1.125-1.306), and Glasgow Coma Scale (AOR, 0.843; 95% CI, 0.802-0.885), were statistically more significant in eligible patients than in noneligible patients. The inhospital mortality rate was significantly higher in eligible patients than that in noneligible patients (40.7% vs 11.5%, p < 0.01). Eligible patients have a higher ratio in both vasopressor and narcotic use and withdrawal of endotracheal tube than noneligible patients ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study results demonstrated that initiating palliative consultation for acute critically ill patients in ED had an impact on the utilization of health care resources and quality of EOL care. Further assessments of the viewpoints of ED patients and their family on palliative care consultations and hospice care are required.