Diagnostic yield and reliability of post‐prandial high‐resolution manometry and impedance‐ph for detecting rumination and supragastric belching in PPI non‐responders. Issue 10 (9th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: DeLay, Kelli; Pandolfino, John E.; Roman, Sabine; Gyawali, C. Prakash; Savarino, Edoardo; Tye, Michael; Kaizer, Alexander; Yadlapati, Rena
• Is Part Of: Neurogastroenterology & motility. Volume 33:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-03-09
• Subjects: behavioral disorders -- belching disorders -- gastroesophageal reflux disease; Gastrointestinal system -- Motility -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal system -- Innervation -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14106
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-1925

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Supragastric belching (SGB) and rumination are behavioral disorders associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) non‐response and can be diagnosed using multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH (MII‐pH) and post‐prandial high‐resolution impedance manometry (PPHRIM). This pilot study compared diagnostic yield and inter‐rater agreement for SGB and rumination using MII‐pH and PPHRIM. Methods: Three esophageal physiologists performed blinded interpretations of MII‐pH and PPHRIM in 22 PPI non‐responders. Raters selected from 4 diagnostic impressions (normal, GERD, behavioral disorders, GERD+behavioral disorders) without clinical context. Primary outcomes were diagnostic impressions compared against clinical gold standard impression, between raters, and between test modalities. Following a 28‐month wash‐out period, raters re‐interpreted MII‐pH with clinical context and under consensus definition of diagnostic criteria. Key Results: Compared to gold standard, rater accuracy for presence of behavioral disorders ranged from 45 to 77% on MII‐pH and 45–59% on PPHRIM. On MII‐pH, inter‐rater agreement was fair for diagnosis (ĸ0.32, p < 0.01) and suboptimal for presence of behavioral disorders (ĸ0.13, p = 0.14). On PPHRIM, inter‐rater agreement was suboptimal for both diagnosis (ĸ0.03, p = 0.34) and presence of a behavioral disorder (ĸ‐0.22, p = 0.96). Inter‐rater agreement improved in post hoc MII‐pH interpretations. Rumination was more frequently identified on PPHRIM (23, 35%) compared to MII‐pH (7, 11%). Conclusions and Inferences: Diagnostic accuracy and inter‐rater agreement are higher for MII‐pH than PPHRIM, and behavioral disorders are more frequently identified on PPHRIM. Identifying behavioral disorders on MII‐pH and PPHRIM has implications for clinical evaluation of PPI non‐response; clinical context is essential for accurate study interpretation. Further work is needed to standardize definitions and interpretations. Abstract : Diagnostic accuracy and inter‐rater agreement are higher for multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII‐pH) than post‐prandial high‐resolution impedance manometry (PPHRIM), and behavioral disorders are more frequently identified on PPHRIM. Identifying behavioral disorders on MII‐pH and PPHRIM has implications for clinical evaluation of PPI non‐response. Clinical context is essential for accurate study interpretation.