Experiences of transgender men in seeking gynecological and reproductive health care: a qualitative systematic review. Issue 9 (28th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sbragia, Julia D.; Vottero, Beth
• Is Part Of: JBI evidence synthesis. Volume 18:Issue 9(2020:Sep.)
• Page Start: 1870
• Page End: 1931
• Publication Date: 2020-09-28
• Subjects: gynecology -- health care -- obstetrics -- qualitative research -- transgender men; Evidence-Based Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodical; Evidence-based medicine; Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00347
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2689-8381

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: The objective of this review was to evaluate the experiences of transgender men in seeking gynecological and reproductive health care. Introduction: Discrimination has led to barriers in care for the transgender community. This is most evident in gender-based care such as gynecological care. Transgender men may continue to require gynecological and reproductive health care despite having a masculine identity and appearance. It is crucial that transgender men have access to gynecological and reproductive health care that is culturally and clinically competent. This review aimed to identify and synthesize the available qualitative data about their experiences in seeking gynecological care. Inclusion criteria: This review considered all studies that included natal females who identified as transgender men, gender non-binary, gender expressive, or gender queer. It included studies that explored the experiences of transgender men seeking gynecological care, obstetrical care, fertility care, or reproductive care in all care environments. As patient experience was the primary focus of the review, only qualitative studies where the data were analyzed into findings and where participant voice was prominent were included. Methods: The databases searched included CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), PubMed, PsycINFO (EBSCO), PsycArticles (EBSCO), ScienceDirect All Subscribed Content (Elsevier), and Web of Science. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature searched included Google Scholar, MedNar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Databases were searched between November 2018 and January 2019. Searches were limited to studies published in English after 1979. Results: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. There was a mix of studies that included only transgender men, as well as studies that included other types of participants. Appraisal of quality was undertaken by two independent reviewers and revealed common concerns found in qualitative reporting. These concerns included the researchers not acknowledging the impact they have on the data and vice versa, as well as not clearly stating the paradigm and methodological underpinnings of the research. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review regardless of quality appraisal. The 26 included studies comprised 874 participants. They yielded 86 findings and accompanying illustrations. These were categorized into 14 categories and further synthesized into five findings: i) negotiating the binary system, ii) navigating the cis-normative world, iii) healthcare access adaptive behaviors, iv) verbal and nonverbal discrimination, and v) provider knowledge and trustworthiness. Conclusions: The findings of this review revealed that transgender men face specific challenges in accessing gynecological and reproductive care. The strictly binary system requires patients to be either male or female, and does not allow for any variation in gender. Gynecological and reproductive spaces and resources are geared exclusively toward heterosexual female clients. Transgender men face discrimination that requires they develop adaptive behaviors. While some of these barriers will not be easily overcome, transgender men feel more comfortable and empowered to seek care when their providers are trusted and knowledgeable about their individualized needs. Recommendations put forth as a result of this review cover policy change, changes to education for staff and providers, changes to academic curricula, and further research.