Timing of Performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 3 (18th March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Timing of Performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 3 (18th March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Timing of Performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Inpatient Mortality in Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Du, Lijun
Cen, Mengsha
Zheng, Xia
Luo, Liang
Siddiqui, Ali
Kim, John J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Although early biliary drainage improves outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis, the optimal time to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of timing of ERCP on mortality in hospitalized patients with acute cholangitis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (until February 2019) for studies evaluating the impact of timing of ERCP (<24, <48, and <72 hours from hospitalization) on outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Fourteen observational studies, including 84, 063 patients (mean age = 66 ± 18), met the study criteria. The overall pooled in-hospital mortality with acute cholangitis was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8%–7.6%), which increased to 4.3% (95% CI 1.8%–8.7%) when administrative database studies were excluded. In 9 studies, ERCP performed <24 compared with ≥24 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73–0.90; I 2 = 0%). In 8 studies, ERCP performed <48 compared with ≥48 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.51–0.63; I 2 = 0%). In 4 studies, ERCP performed <72 compared with ≥72 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.15–0.68; I 2 = 0%). Furthermore, hospital stay was reduced in patients receiving ERCP <24 compared with ≥24 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.2 days, 95% CI 2.3–4.1; I 2 = 78%), <48 comparedAbstract : OBJECTIVES: Although early biliary drainage improves outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis, the optimal time to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of timing of ERCP on mortality in hospitalized patients with acute cholangitis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (until February 2019) for studies evaluating the impact of timing of ERCP (<24, <48, and <72 hours from hospitalization) on outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Fourteen observational studies, including 84, 063 patients (mean age = 66 ± 18), met the study criteria. The overall pooled in-hospital mortality with acute cholangitis was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8%–7.6%), which increased to 4.3% (95% CI 1.8%–8.7%) when administrative database studies were excluded. In 9 studies, ERCP performed <24 compared with ≥24 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73–0.90; I 2 = 0%). In 8 studies, ERCP performed <48 compared with ≥48 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.51–0.63; I 2 = 0%). In 4 studies, ERCP performed <72 compared with ≥72 hours decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.15–0.68; I 2 = 0%). Furthermore, hospital stay was reduced in patients receiving ERCP <24 compared with ≥24 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.2 days, 95% CI 2.3–4.1; I 2 = 78%), <48 compared with ≥48 hours (MD = 3.6 days, 95% CI 2.1–5.1; I 2 = 98%), and <72 compared with ≥72 hours (MD = 4.1 days, 95% CI 0.9–7.3; I 2 = 63%). DISCUSSION: In observational studies, earlier ERCP performed in patients with acute cholangitis, even urgently performed <24 hours from presentation, was associated with reduced mortality. A randomized trial evaluating the impact of urgent ERCP on outcomes is needed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical and translational gastroenterology. Volume 11:Issue 3(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical and translational gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 3(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0011-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- e00158
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-18
- Subjects:
- Stomach -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Intestines -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Liver Diseases
Intestines -- Diseases
Stomach -- Diseases
Periodical
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/52768 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ctg ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1564/ ↗
https://journals.lww.com/ctg/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000158 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2155-384X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24067.xml