Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: EXPERIENCE FROM THE VETERANS AFFAIRS. Issue 2 (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Drwal, Kariann R.; Wakefield, Bonnie J.; Forman, Daniel E.; Wu, Wen-Chih; Haraldsson, Bjarni; El Accaoui, Ramzi N.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention. Volume 41:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 93
• Page End: 99
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: cardiac rehabilitation -- cardiovascular disease -- prevention -- telehealth; Cardiopulmonary system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Cardiopulmonary system -- Diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 616.103
• DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-7501

Abstract

Abstract : Despite acknowledgment of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR), data substantiating its effectiveness and safety remain limited. This study demonstrated strong evidence of effectiveness and safety of the Veterans Affairs national HBCR program to a wide range of patients, including those with high clinical complexity and risk. Abstract : Purpose: The conceptual utility of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) is widely acknowledged. However, data substantiating its effectiveness and safety are limited. This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of the Veterans Affairs (VA) national HBCR program. Methods: Veterans completed a 12-wk HBCR program over 18 mo at 25 geographically dispersed VA hospitals. Pre- to post-changes were compared using paired t tests. Patient satisfaction and adverse events were also summarized descriptively. Results: Of the 923 Veterans with a mean age of 67.3 ± 10.6 yr enrolled in the HBCR program, 572 (62%) completed it. Findings included significant improvements in exercise capacity (6-min walk test distance: 355 vs 398 m; P < .05; Duke Activity Status Index: 27.1 vs 33.5; P < .05; self-reported steps/d: 3150 vs 4166; P < .05); depression measured by Patient Health Questionnaire (6.4 vs 4.9; P < .0001); cardiac self-efficacy (33.1 vs 39.2; P < .0001); body mass index (31.5 vs 31.1 kg/m 2 ; P = .0001); and eating habits measured by Rate Your Plate, Heart (47.2 vs 51.1; P < .05). No safety issues were related to HBCR participation. Participants were highly satisfied. Conclusions: The VA HBCR program demonstrates strong evidence of effectiveness and safety to a wide range of patients, including those with high clinical complexity and risk. HBCR provides an adjunct to site-based programs and access to cardiac rehabilitation. Additional research is needed to assess long-term effects, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of the model.