Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and interprofessional, team-based primary health care: a scoping review. Issue 7 (28th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bobbette, Nicole; Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène; Tranmer, Joan; Lysaght, Rosemary; Ufholz, Lee-Anne; Donnelly, Catherine
• Is Part Of: JBI evidence synthesis. Volume 18:Issue 7(2020:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1470
• Page End: 1514
• Publication Date: 2020-07-28
• Subjects: developmental disability -- intellectual disability -- interprofessional care -- multidisciplinary team -- primary health care; Evidence-Based Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodical; Evidence-based medicine; Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00200
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2689-8381

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: This scoping review aimed to examine the state of the evidence for interprofessional, team-based primary health care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Introduction: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities are a complex, vulnerable population known to experience health inequities. Interprofessional primary health care teams are recommended to improve access to comprehensive and coordinated health care for these individuals. Limited information is available regarding what services interprofessional primary health care teams provide and how services are evaluated specific to the care of this population. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review considered all studies that referenced individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities who were 18 years or older. It considered all studies that referred to health care provision within a primary health care context. All studies that discussed the provision of interprofessional primary health care services were included. "Interprofessional primary health care team" was the term used to describe services provided by health providers (e.g. physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, dietitians, social workers, mental health workers, occupational therapists, physical therapists) working in a team-based model of care. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs were considered for inclusion. In addition, systematic reviews, program descriptions, clinical reviews, and opinion papers were considered. Studies published in English and French were included. The period considered was from 2000 to the date of the searches (July and August 2018 for bibliographic databases and January 2019 for the final searches of unpublished studies and selected papers from key authors). Results: The search identified 2761 records. Despite the global search strategy, only 20 records were included in the final review, mainly consisting of work based in the United States and Canada. Results were heterogeneous and descriptive in nature, consisting of cross-sectional designs, program descriptions, and clinical reviews. The findings represent only a few distinct interprofessional primary health care team models of care and multiple contributions from a small pool of researchers. Roles for physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, social workers, and mental health providers were identified. Ten studies identified either patient-reported outcomes or health-utilization outcomes. Overall, there was no consistent reporting of outcomes across studies, and outcomes specifically related to many interprofessional services were not captured. Although interprofessional, team-based approaches are supported at a policy and practice level, the concept of interprofessional primary health care for this population remains understudied and is challenged by differences in primary health care provision across the world, complexity in how the field is defined, as well as a lack of consistent reporting of the organizational attributes and processes that support interprofessional primary health care provision. Conclusions: To fully realize the potential of interprofessional primary health care teams, health services research is needed to describe organizational attributes and processes, and evaluate interventions for this population. Engaging in this work will ultimately provide a more fulsome evidence base to support high-quality, interprofessional primary health care provision for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.