Evaluation of post-simulation sonographer students' professional behaviour in the workplace. Issue 4 (November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bowman, A.; Reid, D.; Bobby Harreveld, R.; Lawson, C.
• Is Part Of: Radiography. Volume 28:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 889
• Page End: 896
• Publication Date: 2022-11
• Subjects: Education -- Professional identity -- Professional behaviour -- Professionalism -- Sonographer -- Clinical evaluation; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.06.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-8174

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: In Australia, sonographer's professional identity is traditionally 'caught' from clinical role models. A four-year undergraduate-postgraduate course introduced professional identity education, with simulated practice, to prepare novice sonographer students prior to clinical practice. Preclinical students learnt sonographer professional behaviour, and humanistic attributes, during simulation designed with volunteer peers as standardised patients, educator role-models, immediate feedback, self-reflection, and longitudinal multi-observer assessment. This paper reports on the transfer of learnt professional behaviour and humanistic attributes to clinical practice. Methods: Professional behaviour evaluations completed by 94 clinical assessors described 174 students' professional behaviour and attributes one month into their initial clinical practice (2015-6). Student performance of each behaviour, and behavioural category, was quantitatively analysed by modelling binomial proportions with logistic regression. Results: Students demonstrated substantial learning transfer to clinical practice, achieving an overall mean score of 'consistent' sonographer professional behaviour and humanistic attributes (mean score of equal to or >3/4), one month into clinical practice. Professional behaviours varied in transferability, with 'response to patient's questions' showing least efficacy (P < 0.05). Increased deliberate practice with educator role-models improved transfer efficacy significantly (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Preclinical application of theory to simulated practice, using standardised patients, educator role-models, immediate feedback, and multi-observer assessment, facilitated substantial transfer of sonographer professional behaviour and attributes to clinical practice. The efficacy of transfer varied but improved with increased deliberate practice and feedback. Implications for practice: The incorporation of preclinical professional behaviour education with simulated practice into the core curriculum of sonographer courses is recommended for the formation of sonographer professional identity, improved clinical outcomes and increased patient safety during the early stages of ultrasound education.