Pseudo-aortic dissection after sudden cardiac death in coronary angiography a case report: Pearls and pitfalls in false aortic dissection artifacts. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: García-Escobar, Artemio; Vera-Vera, Silvio; Jurado-Román, Alfonso; Jiménez-Valero, Santiago; Galeote, Guillermo; Moreno, Raúl
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery case reports. Volume 99(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Pseudo-aortic dissection -- False-positive aortic dissection -- Cardiac arrest -- Coronary angiography; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2210-2612

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction and importance: Various artifacts mimicked aortic dissection, such as streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, cardiac motion, periaortic structures, aortic wall motion, and normal aortic sinuses, have been described in the literature. Most artifacts that simulate ascending aortic dissection occur frequently on conventional CT. Their position is predictable and is related to systolic aortic motion. However, so far, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first pseudo-aortic dissection reported during coronary angiography in cardiac arrest. Case presentation: We report a case of a middle-aged man transferred to our hospital after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The coronary angiography revealed non-obstructive coronary arteries and an image of probable aortic dissection was observed. Given the persistent asystole despite a prolonged advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the possibility of aortic dissection, a prompt in-room heart team discussion was performed. It was decided to stop and withdraw potentially life-sustaining treatment due to futility. The necropsy study revealed the aorta with some mild atherosclerotic plaques but without either aneurysm or thrombosis. The coronary arteries were reported as with patency, but in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), the intima layer presented a thickness that decreased 50 % of the luminal area without signs of complicated acute plaques. Clinical discussion: In this case, the systolic aortic motion theory cannot explain the false-aortic dissection image in the coronary angiography because the patient was under cardiac arrest. Studies with arterial and venous pressures devices recording in cardiac arrest, demonstrated an abnormal hemodynamic flow, suggesting that the hemodynamic flow might be backward during cardiopulmonary resuscitation Therefore, in the setting of this abnormal hemodynamic flow, the injection of contrast may have an abnormal distribution and flow in the aorta creating an image of pseudo-aortic dissection. Conclusion: Although the exact mechanism of this false-positive aortic dissection in cardiac arrest remains unknown, operators should be aware of this entity during coronary angiography in the setting of cardiac arrest with mechanical chest compressions to avoid diagnostic errors in clinical practice. Highlights: Most artifacts that simulate ascending aortic dissection are related to systolic aortic motion. In cardiac arrest with mechanical cardiac compressions, venous pressure is dominant to arterial. Hemodynamic flow might be backward during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. False-positive aortic dissection can be seen in cardiac arrest with mechanical cardiac compressions.