Comparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans. (2nd August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gallo, Pier; Díaz‐Báez, David; Perdomo, Sandra; Aloise, Antonio Carlos; Tattan, Mustafa; Saleh, Muhammad H. A.; Pelegrine, André Antonio; Ravidà, Andrea; Wang, Hom‐Lay
• Is Part Of: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. Volume 24:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 709
• Page End: 719
• Publication Date: 2022-08-02
• Subjects: alveolar bone grafting -- bone augmentation -- bone substitutes -- dental implants -- guided bone regeneration; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dental Implantation -- Periodicals; Dental Implants -- Periodicals; 617.693
• DOI: 10.1111/cid.13124
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1523-0899

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The vertical increase of the alveolar ridge dimension using allograft or xenograft mixed with autogenous bone graft and covered by a nonabsorbable high‐density polytetrafluoroethylene (d‐PTFE) membrane is well documented in the literature. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess vital mineralized tissue formation in vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) procedures using autogenous bone chips mixed either with an allograft or a xenograft. Methods: This prospective clinical trial recruited 16 partially edentulous patients to undergo vertical ridge augmentation in one or more sites, making up a total of 24 samples for histological evaluation. Patients were sequentially stratified into Group A (treated with a freeze‐dried bone allograft [FDBA] mixed with autogenous bone) or to Group B (treated with a bovine xenograft mixed with autogenous bone). Histological samples were analyzed according to the biomaterial used for VRA. Histological samples were obtained on the same day of membrane removal and implant placement. Results: Thirty‐three implants were placed in 16 sites of regenerated bone via VRA, 13 patients with ridge augmentation in the posterior mandible, and 3 patients with VRA in the anterior maxilla. Group A (FDBA + autogenous) and Group B (xenograft + autogenous) showed a percent vital mineralized tissue (VMT) area of 67.64 ± 16.84 and 60.93 ± 18.25, respectively. A significant difference between the two biomaterials was not observed. Conclusion: When mixed with autogenous bone, either allografts or xenografts may provide a successful augmentation. Either mixture could serve as reliable alternative in VRA for obtaining a high percentage of VMT.