Evaluation of the evidence for self-management post-stroke within clinical practice guidelines for people with stroke: A systematic review. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Henry, Leah; Leahy, Siobhan; McCurtin, Arlene; Boland, Pauline
• Is Part Of: British journal of occupational therapy. Volume 85:Number 12(2022)
• Page Start: 923
• Page End: 946
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: guideline -- recommendation -- self-management -- stroke; Occupational therapy -- Periodicals; 615.8515
• DOI: 10.1177/03080226221107768
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-0226

Abstract

Introduction: Self-management post-stroke is essential where healthcare systems are stretched and stroke prevalence remains high. Self-management is recommended in stroke guidelines however, the quality of guidelines can vary and the evidence underpinning recommendations is unclear. The objectives of this paper are to identify and appraise current stroke guidelines, synthesise self-management recommendations and assess the evidentiary basis of these recommendations. Method: Stroke guidelines were retrieved from a search of four databases and stroke association websites in July 2021. Four independent reviewers assessed their quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation 2nd Edition instrument. Self-management recommendations were extracted by hand, evaluated, synthesised and the evidence underpinning them appraised using the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations framework. Results: Eleven guidelines were included in this systematic review, all of excellent methodological quality overall. One hundred and sixty-one recommendations were extracted from these guidelines and grouped into ten principles of self-management. A quarter of the recommendations were underpinned by level A evidence, 32% level B and 43% level C. Conclusion: Although current stroke guidelines are of high methodological quality, there are considerable inconsistencies in self-management recommendations within and between these guidelines, with varying strengths of underpinning evidence. This article identifies a need for universal consensus regarding evidence-based self-management post-stroke.