Comparative efficacy of sedation or analgesia methods for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis. (11th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hayashi, Minoru; Kano, Kenichi; Kuroda, Naoto; Yamamoto, Norio; Shiroshita, Akihiro; Kataoka, Yuki
• Is Part Of: Academic emergency medicine. Volume 29:Number 10(2022)
• Page Start: 1160
• Page End: 1171
• Publication Date: 2022-08-11
• Subjects: analgesia -- conscious sedation -- intraarticular injection -- nerve block -- shoulder dislocation; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; 616.02505
• DOI: 10.1111/acem.14568
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1069-6563

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We performed a network meta‐analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous sedation (IVS), intraarticular anesthetic injection (IAA), and peripheral nerve block (PNB) as sedation or analgesia methods for the reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different sedation or analgesia methods for anterior shoulder dislocation reduction. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched in October 2021. We conducted a random‐effects NMA within a frequentist framework. We evaluated the confidence in each outcome using the CINeMA tool. Results: Sixteen RCTs (957 patients) were included. Regarding the primary outcomes, the three methods might result in little to no difference in the immediate success rate of reduction and patient satisfaction. The IAA method had a shorter emergency department length of stay than that of the IVS method (mean difference [MD] −107.88 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] −202.58 to −13.18). In the secondary outcomes, the IAA method had a lower pain score than that of the PNB method (standardized MD −1.83, 95% CI −3.64 to −0.02). The IAA and PNB methods might require a longer time for reduction than that of the IVS method (MD 5.3 min, 95% CI 2.4 to 10.36; MD 15.25, 95% CI 5.49 to 25.01). The three methods might result in little to no difference in the number of reduction attempts and total success rate of reduction. However, the confidence ratings for all treatment comparisons were very low. IAA and PNB had no adverse respiratory events. Conclusions: The results of our NMA indicated that three sedation or analgesia methods (IVS, IAA, and PNB) might result in little to no difference in the success rate of reduction and patient satisfaction. IAA and PNB had no adverse respiratory events.