The validity of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in North Korean defectors using the International Trauma Questionnaire. Issue 2 (19th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baek, Jiwon; Kim, Kyoung-A.; Kim, Hokon; Kim, Ocksim; Ko, Minjeong; Kim, Soo Hyun; Sohn, In Bae; Shin, Bo Kyung; Jeon, Woo Taek; Chu, Sang Hui
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 13:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-19
• Subjects: ICD-11 Trauma Questionnaire -- PTSD -- complex PTSD -- North Korean defectors -- CFA -- LCA; Cuestionario de Trauma CIE-11 -- TEPT -- TEPT complejo -- Desertores Norcoreanos; ICD-11创伤问卷；PTSD；复杂性PTSD；朝鲜叛逃者; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2119012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a self-report assessment focused on the core features of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD). It is consistent with the organizing principles of the 11th revision to the WHO's International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Since the 1990s, the number of North Korean defectors (NKD) entering South Korea to escape human rights violations has been increasing rapidly, with 33, 815 NKD settled by 2021. The South Korean government faces an important challenge in supporting NKD to successfully adapt and settle in South Korean society. NKD experience various traumatic events during the process of defecting and repatriation. Therefore, it is essential to understand the psychological disorders of NKD, especially PTSD and CPTSD. Objective: This study aimed to test the validity of the ITQ assessment and explore the differences in symptoms and quality of life between PTSD and CPTSD. Method: The study sample comprised 503 trauma-exposed NKD. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and latent class analysis (LCA) were used to evaluate the validity of ITQ. One-way analysis of variances and post-hoc analyses revealed the difference in the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS) and WHOQOL-BREF results among PTSD and CPTSD symptom LCA classes. Results: The CFA and LCA results supported the ICD-11 conceptualization of PTSD and CPTSD in NKD. The CFA results confirmed that both the first- and second-order models were statistically fit, but for community-dwelling NKD the first-order model had better model fit than the second-order model. The LCA findings revealed a four-class model with 'PTSD', 'CPTSD', 'DSO', and 'low symptom' classes. Compared to the PTSD class, CPTSD class had higher levels of depression and somatic symptoms and a lower quality of life. Conclusion: This study provided evidence that ITQ is a valid tool to assess PTSD or CPTSD in community-dwelling NKD. HIGHLIGHTS: First study to test validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD for NKD with a Korean version of the ITQ. Provided evidence that ITQ is a valid tool to assess PTSD or CPTSD in NKD. Results revealed that depression and somatic symptoms and quality of life were different for PTSD and CPTSD, and that CPTSD was worse than PTSD.