"I don't believe I'm going to recover from anything." Understanding recovery amongst people with severe mental illness attending community health services in Spain. Issue 20 (25th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saavedra, Javier; Arias-Sánchez, Samuel; Matías-García, Jose Antonio; Brzeska, Joanna
• Is Part Of: Disability and rehabilitation. Volume 44:Issue 20(2022)
• Page Start: 5974
• Page End: 5982
• Publication Date: 2022-09-25
• Subjects: Mental health recovery -- community health services -- severe mental illness -- schizophrenia -- bipolar disorder -- culture; People with disabilities -- Periodicals; Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 617.03
• DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1954246
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0963-8288

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The concept of recovery has become the backbone of mental health services and professional practices. However, research aimed at analysing the conceptualisation of recovery of people diagnosed with severe mental illness (SMI) has an obvious Anglo-Saxon bias. Our objective was to analyse what a sample of 51 users of mental health services diagnosed with SMI in Spain understand by recovery. Method: The participants were interviewed in depth about their concept of recovery, and their responses were thematically analysed by three observers. Results: Four categories of definitions of the concept of recovery were found in the analysis: Socio-Behavioural, Biomedical, Resistance, and Wellbeing-Growth. Inter-rater reliability scores ranged from 0.7 to 0.84 according to Krippendorff's alpha. While the Biomedical category essentially corresponded to the idea of clinical recovery, the Wellbeing-Growth category reproduced the concept of personal recovery (PR) that is dominant in the literature. The most frequent categories were Socio-Behavioural and Biomedical. Assimilation of the PR concept by participants was quite limited. The markedly relational character of the most frequent categories challenges the individualistic core of the classic definition of PR. Conclusions: We advocate the need to make alternative recovery concepts and narratives visible to the mental health services' users and practitioners. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The concept of personal recovery is not common amongst mental health services' users as recovery is mainly understood in social and biomedical terms. Different conceptualizations of recovery can coexist in participants. Mental health services should consider alternative narratives to personal recovery. Mental health services should provide resources for creating community and sense of belonging as first strategies for promoting recovery.