Influence of Heavy Atom Effect on the Photophysics of Coinage Metal Carbene‐Metal‐Amide Emitters. (25th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Feng, Jiale; Reponen, Antti‐Pekka M.; Romanov, Alexander S.; Linnolahti, Mikko; Bochmann, Manfred; Greenham, Neil C.; Penfold, Thomas; Credgington, Dan
• Is Part Of: Advanced functional materials. Volume 31:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-09-25
• Subjects: carbene‐metal‐amide -- charge‐transfer -- heavy atom effect -- intersystem crossing -- photoluminescence -- photophysics; Materials -- Periodicals; Chemical vapor deposition -- Periodicals; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202005438
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1616-301X

Abstract

Abstract: The effect of the heavy metal atom on the photophysics of carbene‐metal‐amide (CMA) photoemitters is explored, where the metal bridge is either Au, Ag, or Cu. Spectroscopic investigations reveal the coupling mechanism responsible for communication between the singlet and triplet manifolds. The photophysical properties do not reflect expected trends based upon the heavy atom effect, as both direct coupling between charge‐transfer states and spin‐vibronic coupling via a ligand‐centered triplet state are present. Direct coupling is weakest for CMA(Ag), increasing the importance of the spin‐vibronic pathway and rendering its properties more sensitive to inter‐state energy gaps than for the Au and Cu‐bridged analogues. The measured activation energy correlates with the expected exchange energy of the charge‐transfer state, which is also closely related to the length of the bonds joining the carbene and amide ligands, and decreases in the order CMA(Cu) > CMA(Au) > CMA(Ag). These findings reveal that reducing interference between charge‐transfer and ligand‐centers excited, and minimizing exchange energy, are required for developing efficient luminescent CMA complexes. Abstract : The influence of the metal atom on the photophysics of carbene‐metal‐amide (CMA) photoemitters is explored. Measured intersystem crossing (ISC) rates are ordered CMA(Cu) > CMA(Au) > CMA(Ag). Reverse ISC depends strongly on activation energy, with rates ordered CMA(Ag) > CMA(Au) > CMA(Cu). Coupling between the singlet and triplet manifolds is not therefore governed by the heavy atom effect.