Behavior‐specific habitat selection by African lions may promote their persistence in a human‐dominated landscape. Issue 4 (28th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suraci, Justin P.; Frank, Laurence G.; Oriol‐Cotterill, Alayne; Ekwanga, Steve; Williams, Terrie M.; Wilmers, Christopher C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 100:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-02-28
• Subjects: behavioral state classification -- ecology of fear -- human–wildlife conflict -- large carnivore conservation -- movement ecology -- Panthera leo -- step selection function; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2644
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Co‐occurrence with humans presents substantial risks for large carnivores, yet human‐dominated landscapes are increasingly crucial to carnivore conservation as human land use continues to encroach on wildlife habitat. Flexibility in large carnivore behavior may be a primary factor mediating coexistence with people, allowing carnivores to calibrate their activity and habitat use to the perceived level of human risk. However, our understanding of how large carnivores adjust the timing and location of behaviors in response to variations in human activity across the landscape remains limited, impacting our ability to identify important habitat for populations outside of protected areas. Here we examine whether African lions ( Panthera leo ) modify their behavior and habitat use in response to risk of a human encounter, and whether behavior‐specific habitat selection allows lions to access feeding opportunities in a human‐dominated landscape in Kenya. We determined fine‐scale behavioral states for lions using high‐resolution GPS and accelerometer data, and then investigated behavior‐specific habitat selection at multiple temporal and spatial scales (ranging from 15 minutes to 12 hours and from approximately 200 meters to several kilometers). We found that lions exhibit substantial differences in habitat selection with respect to humans based on behavioral state and time of day. During the day, when risk of human encounter is highest, lions avoided areas of high human use when resting, meandering, and feeding. However, lions specifically selected for habitat near people when feeding at night. Flexible habitat use by lions thus permits access to prey, which appear to concentrate in areas near humans. The importance of habitat near people for feeding was only apparent when analyses explicitly accounted for lion behavioral state and spatiotemporal scale, highlighting the necessity of incorporating such information when investigating human impacts on large carnivore habitat use. Our results support the contention that behavior‐specific habitat selection promotes carnivore persistence in human‐dominated landscapes, demonstrating the importance of considering not just whether but how large carnivores use habitat near humans when managing vulnerable populations.