Conversion of the MDHAQ to the HAQ score: a simple algorithm developed and validated in a cohort of 13 391 real-world patients. (2nd February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Conversion of the MDHAQ to the HAQ score: a simple algorithm developed and validated in a cohort of 13 391 real-world patients. (2nd February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Conversion of the MDHAQ to the HAQ score: a simple algorithm developed and validated in a cohort of 13 391 real-world patients
- Authors:
- Ørnbjerg, Lykke M
Svensson, Elisabeth
Løngaard, Katja
Meincke, Rikke H
Pedersen, Jens Kristian
Dreyer, Lene
Krogh, Niels Steen
Jensen, Dorte V
Hetland, Merete L - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To develop and validate in real-world patients a conversion algorithm from the Multidimensionel Health Assessment Questionnaire physical function scale (MDHAQ) to the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index physical function scale (HAQ) score. Methods: From the DANBIO registry, 13 391 patients with RA ( n = 8983), PsA ( n = 2649) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, n = 1759) with longitudinal data on HAQ and MDHAQ were included, stratified by diagnosis, and randomized 1:1 into development and validation cohorts. Conversion algorithms were developed by linear regression and applied in validation cohorts. From MDHAQ, the HAQ was calculated (cHAQ) and validated against the observed HAQ for criterion, correlational and construct validity. Results: For RA, we developed the conversion algorithm cHAQ = 0.15+MDHAQ*1.08, and validated it in the RA validation cohort. Criterion validity : HAQ and cHAQ had comparable discriminative power to distinguish between high and low patient global scores (standardized mean difference: HAQ:–1.29, cHAQ:–1.35). Kappa value between HAQ and cHAQ functional states indicated good agreement (0.83). Correlational validity : baseline HAQ and cHAQ, respectively, correlated well with patient global scores (r = 0.65/0.67). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement across all functional states. Construct validity : HAQ and cHAQ discriminated equally well between patients reporting symptom state as acceptable vs not,Abstract: Objectives: To develop and validate in real-world patients a conversion algorithm from the Multidimensionel Health Assessment Questionnaire physical function scale (MDHAQ) to the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index physical function scale (HAQ) score. Methods: From the DANBIO registry, 13 391 patients with RA ( n = 8983), PsA ( n = 2649) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, n = 1759) with longitudinal data on HAQ and MDHAQ were included, stratified by diagnosis, and randomized 1:1 into development and validation cohorts. Conversion algorithms were developed by linear regression and applied in validation cohorts. From MDHAQ, the HAQ was calculated (cHAQ) and validated against the observed HAQ for criterion, correlational and construct validity. Results: For RA, we developed the conversion algorithm cHAQ = 0.15+MDHAQ*1.08, and validated it in the RA validation cohort. Criterion validity : HAQ and cHAQ had comparable discriminative power to distinguish between high and low patient global scores (standardized mean difference: HAQ:–1.29, cHAQ:–1.35). Kappa value between HAQ and cHAQ functional states indicated good agreement (0.83). Correlational validity : baseline HAQ and cHAQ, respectively, correlated well with patient global scores (r = 0.65/0.67). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement across all functional states. Construct validity : HAQ and cHAQ discriminated equally well between patients reporting symptom state as acceptable vs not, and across responses to an external anchor. Aiming for a common algorithm, the RA conversion algorithm was validated for PsA and axSpA with similar results. Conclusion: This study suggests that in observational datasets with only the MDHAQ available, a simple algorithm allows valid conversion to HAQ on the group level in RA, PsA and axSpA. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Rheumatology. Volume 61:Number 10(2022)
- Journal:
- Rheumatology
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Number 10(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 10 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0061-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 3919
- Page End:
- 3929
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-02
- Subjects:
- RA -- PsA -- axial spondyloarthritis -- HAQ
Rheumatism -- Periodicals
Rheumatology -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://rheumatology.oupjournals.org ↗
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/rheumatology/keac040 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1462-0324
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7960.731900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24017.xml